On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, 01:02 Martin Sebor, wrote:
>
> So I wonder if changing configure to either implicitly use a command
> line option for its tests or set an environment variable to request
> a permissive mode might be a way out.
>
Having a different set of rules for configure scripts is bound
On 2/20/21 8:46 AM, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 15:25 +0100, David Brown wrote:
On 19/02/2021 12:18, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:42, David Brown wrote:
Just to be clear - I am not in any way suggesting that this
situation is
the fault of any
On 20/02/2021 16:46, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 15:25 +0100, David Brown wrote:
>
> I think we need to think about both of these use-cases e.g. as we
> implement our diagnostics, and that we should mention this distinction
> in our UX guidelines...
>
>> Is it possible to di
On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 15:25 +0100, David Brown wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 12:18, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:42, David Brown wrote:
> > > Just to be clear - I am not in any way suggesting that this
> > > situation is
> > > the fault of any gcc developers. If configure
On 19/02/2021 12:18, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:42, David Brown wrote:
>> Just to be clear - I am not in any way suggesting that this situation is
>> the fault of any gcc developers. If configure scripts are failing
>> because they rely on poor C code or inappropria
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 11:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:42, David Brown wrote:
> > Just to be clear - I am not in any way suggesting that this situation is
> > the fault of any gcc developers. If configure scripts are failing
> > because they rely on poor C code or inap
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 09:42, David Brown wrote:
> Just to be clear - I am not in any way suggesting that this situation is
> the fault of any gcc developers. If configure scripts are failing
> because they rely on poor C code or inappropriate use of gcc (code that
> requires a particular C standa
On 19/02/2021 09:45, Florian Weimer wrote:
* David Brown:
On 18/02/2021 13:31, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
Declare your functions. Don't ignore warnings.
It's actually a GCC bug that this isn't an error. However, too many
configure scripts would still break
* David Brown:
> On 18/02/2021 13:31, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>> * Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
>>
>>> Declare your functions. Don't ignore warnings.
>>
>> It's actually a GCC bug that this isn't an error. However, too many
>> configure scripts would still break if we changed the default.
>>
On 18/02/2021 13:31, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> * Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
>
>> Declare your functions. Don't ignore warnings.
>
> It's actually a GCC bug that this isn't an error. However, too many
> configure scripts would still break if we changed the default.
>
People have had 22 year
* Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
> Declare your functions. Don't ignore warnings.
It's actually a GCC bug that this isn't an error. However, too many
configure scripts would still break if we changed the default.
So either use -Werror=implicit-function-declaration or C++ for the time
being.
Thanks,
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, 21:12 Thanos Makatos via Gcc, wrote:
> I run into a problem that I'm not sure whether it's a bug in my program
> (most likely) or something wrong with GCC (highly unlikely, I know, hence
> why I haven't sent this to gcc-bugs).
This is the wrong list, please use gcc-help fo
On 2/17/21 2:05 PM, Thanos Makatos via Gcc wrote:
I run into a problem that I'm not sure whether it's a bug in my program (most
likely) or something wrong with GCC (highly unlikely, I know, hence why I
haven't sent this to gcc-bugs). The problem is using a function that returns a
bool, defined
I run into a problem that I'm not sure whether it's a bug in my program (most
likely) or something wrong with GCC (highly unlikely, I know, hence why I
haven't sent this to gcc-bugs). The problem is using a function that returns a
bool, defined in another source file without a declaration, and t
14 matches
Mail list logo
