Philip Pemberton writes:
>> The address is unusual:
>>
>> (subreg:SI (mem/s:DI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 39 [ ctx ])
>> (const_int 64 [0x40])) [0 S8 A64]) 4)
>>
>> Why isn't that simply
>>
>> (mem/s:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 39 [ ctx ])
>> (const_int 68 [0x40]))
On 25/05/10 06:06, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The official list of maintainers is stored in the gcc source code in
the file MAINTAINERS. Having said that, there is no maintainer listed
for lm32. I assume that it must be, as you suggest, Jon Beniston.
Yeah, I spotted that in SVN about five minute
Philip Pemberton writes:
> 1) Who's the current maintainer for the lm32 port? Jon Beniston?
> I can't see anything on the gcc website that says definitively "target
> X is maintained by $PERSON", and I really don't want to step on
> his/her toes and start a flame war, turf war or any other kind o
Hi guys,
About a month ago I opened a bug on Bugzilla:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43805
This relates to gcc crashing out with an Internal Compiler Error when
doing a build of Linux kernel 2.6.34-rc4. Basically, as soon as the
build hits fs/timerfd.c, an ICE is thrown:
fs/ti
