Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-11 Thread Sunzir Deepur
Hi Jim, On 9/12/07, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sunzir Deepur wrote: > > recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of > > (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in > > the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed > > that the chages

Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-11 Thread Jim Wilson
Sunzir Deepur wrote: recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed that the chages were different __FUNCTION__.numbers (in the __FUNCTION__. xxx symbol names)

understanding __FUNCTION__ generation

2007-09-11 Thread Sunzir Deepur
hi list, recently I've encountered a problem in which some removals of (what seems to be unneeded) lines of header files inflicted changes in the resulting binary. further inverstigation showed that the chages were different __FUNCTION__.numbers (in the __FUNCTION__. xxx symbol names). can someon