Great, I'll read more closely formatting rules next time I'll submit something.
Regards,
Selim
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : lundi 20 avril 2015 19:47
À : BELBACHIR Selim; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Objet : Re: try_merge_delay_insn with delay
On 04/20/2015 05:08 AM, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
I've attached the fixed version of the patch. I've tested it on the trunk with
my private target.
I can't provide a test because apparently no backend (other than my private
one) uses delay slots with more that 1 slot.
I was also unable to test th
t.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 17 avril 2015 18:41
À : BELBACHIR Selim; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Objet : Re: try_merge_delay_insn with delay list > 1
On 03/10/2015 07:40 AM, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
> Me again :)
>
> I enhanced my patch because it was not generalized for instructions with N
> delay
On 03/10/2015 07:40 AM, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
Me again :)
I enhanced my patch because it was not generalized for instructions with N
delay_slots.
Mostly OK, though there are some formatting nits that need to be corrected.
We have whitespace around arithmetic, logical and comparison operators
Me again :)
I enhanced my patch because it was not generalized for instructions with N
delay_slots.
Selim
try_merge_patch2
Description: try_merge_patch2
Hi,
I'm still working on a private backend on gcc 4.9.2. My processor provides
instructions with 2 delay slots. I'm well aware that this feature is very
uncommon and not fully tested. Nevertheless I submit the problem and the
solution I've found.
The bug is located in the function try_merge_de
