Stefan Lampe writes:
> Here's some code that produced a surprising result with GCC 4.3.3 on
> linux 64. I'd have expected all addresses output to be the same.
This message should have gone to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org rather than
g...@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups to gcc-help. Thanks.
You
Hi,
Here's some code that produced a surprising result with GCC 4.3.3 on linux 64.
I'd have expected all addresses output to be the same.
I guess the reason for this is that when merging the templates instantiated in
one.cpp and two.cpp, the linker doesn't perform a complete merge, but only
m
