too costly to implement.
Thanks
Mohamed
في الأربعاء، ١١ مايو، ٢٠٢٢ ١٢:٢٠ ص André Coelho via Gcc
كتب:
> Hey...if the compiler can check syntax errors...why can't it fixed them?
>
>
> thanks
>
>
> andre coelho
>
>
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:19 PM André Coelho via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hey...if the compiler can check syntax errors...why can't it fixed them?
In some cases it does recommend ways of fixing it. But not all syntax
errors are fixable.
Also not all syntax errors might be the wrong behavior
Hey...if the compiler can check syntax errors...why can't it fixed them?
thanks
andre coelho
On 1/3/19 8:40 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
Hello!
I have used GCC for decades and would like to contribute a little. :-
)
Hi, and welcome!
I would like to see if I can improve the syntax errors.
Here is one example code:
int x
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 17:03, Daniel Marjamäki
wrote:
>
> Thank you for the quick reply.
>
> > how about "stray %qs token"?
>
> I will change.
>
> > I wonder how much we want to special-case this. Are you thinking about
> > the case where there's a stray symbol in the code (perhaps due to a
> > str
Thank you for the quick reply.
> how about "stray %qs token"?
I will change.
> I wonder how much we want to special-case this. Are you thinking about
> the case where there's a stray symbol in the code (perhaps due to a
> stray keypress, or unfinished manual edits)?
At the moment I only think a
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 15:40, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have used GCC for decades and would like to contribute a little. :-
> > )
>
> Hi, and welcome!
>
> > I would l
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have used GCC for decades and would like to contribute a little. :-
> )
Hi, and welcome!
> I would like to see if I can improve the syntax errors.
>
> Here is one example code:
>
>
Hello!
I have used GCC for decades and would like to contribute a little. :-)
I would like to see if I can improve the syntax errors.
Here is one example code:
int x = 3) + 0;
I have created this ugly experimental patch:
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
@@ -2228,7 +2228,10
