On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
> You failed to state a single case where a violation is caught.
It's not about catching violations of law, it's about catching cases where
the source tree is in an inconsistent state. And a not uncommon cause of
that is that someone didn't know about the
On Nov 27, 2012, at 4:50 PM, "Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> A review of the change and approval of the change should be enough to
>> catch issues going into the FSF tree. The build should just copy the
>> generated file to the source tree, if changed. T
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
> A review of the change and approval of the change should be enough to
> catch issues going into the FSF tree. The build should just copy the
> generated file to the source tree, if changed. The build failed for me,
The rule from the FSF is that tm.tex
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> This:
>>
>> Verify that you have permission to grant a GFDL license for all
>> new text in tm.texi, then copy it to ../../gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.
>> make[3]: *** [s-tm-texi] Error 1
>> make[3]
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> This:
>
> Verify that you have permission to grant a GFDL license for all
> new text in tm.texi, then copy it to ../../gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.
> make[3]: *** [s-tm-texi] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs….
>
> is one of the stupid
This:
Verify that you have permission to grant a GFDL license for all
new text in tm.texi, then copy it to ../../gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.
make[3]: *** [s-tm-texi] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs….
is one of the stupidest build errors I've seen all decade. Can someone fix it
please?
