-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/11 08:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> What's the best way to test the sparc-rtems target? Do you use a sim?
> I've got access to sparcs via the gcc buildfarm, but that's about it.
>
>> We use the sis/erc32 simulator in gdb.
>
>> You have to bui
On 02/08/2011 09:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/11 12:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/11 12:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In the pas
On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
a
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
patch seems to h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the past few days, something has regressed
> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
> and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the past few days, something has regressed
> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
> and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 16
Hi,
In the past few days, something has regressed
on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's
patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
has 2231 failures.
http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-tooltestresults/2011-January/000407.
