On 20 February 2018 at 15:43, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> I posted here because I saw it as a possible diagnostic bug / limitation. Do
> such things go to gcc-help? Or is it that you thought I was asking for the
> correct option?
Bug reports and enhancement requests go to bugzilla not here,
> On 20 Feb 2018, at 16:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> This question belongs on the gcc-help list really.
I posted here because I saw it as a possible diagnostic bug / limitation. Do
such things go to gcc-help? Or is it that you thought I was asking for the
correct option?
> On 20 February
This question belongs on the gcc-help list really.
On 20 February 2018 at 14:44, Christophe de Dinechin
wrote:
> I wonder why -Wsign-compare only warns when there is no int promotion?
I suspect the correct-but-not-helpful answer is that after integer
promotion the operands have the same type, a
I wonder why -Wsign-compare only warns when there is no int promotion?
No warning for this, where the result is “surprisingly” false because of int
promotion:
signed char i = (signed char) -3;
unsigned char j = (unsigned char) -3;
printf("i=%x j=%x i==j=%d\n", i, j, i==j);
gcc -Wsign-co
