sorry, The numbers were too good, something was wrong in my setup.
thanks, Dinar,
>> before:
>>Base Base Base Peak
>> Peak Peak
>>BenchmarksRef Time Run Time RatioRef Time Run Time Ratio
>>---
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
>> The error in 252.eon was due to incorrect setup. Also "if (count >
>> 3*PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_SWITCH_JUMP_TABLES_BB_OPS_LIMIT))" does not look
>> correct, and probably it is better
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov
wrote:
> Hi,
> We noticed some performance gains if we are not using jump over some
> simple switch statements. Here is the idea: Check whether the switch
> statement can be expanded with conditional instructions. In that case
> jump tables shou
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:23:58AM +0400, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
> Hi,
> We noticed some performance gains if we are not using jump over some
> simple switch statements. Here is the idea: Check whether the switch
> statement can be expanded with conditional instructions. In that case
> jump tabl
Hi,
We noticed some performance gains if we are not using jump over some
simple switch statements. Here is the idea: Check whether the switch
statement can be expanded with conditional instructions. In that case
jump tables should be avoided since some branch instructions can be
eliminated in furth
