On 03/05/13 06:03, reed kotler wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 08:41 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
>> 2013/5/3 reed kotler :
>>> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
>>> attribute.
>>>
>>> There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement
>>> between
>>> various
>>>
On 03/05/13 06:40, Geert Bosch wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2013, at 00:15, reed kotler wrote:
>
>> There was some confusion on the llvm list because some tests were run on
>> targets that did not support the naked attribute.
>>
>> I think we are thinking now that the return statement should not be emi
On May 3, 2013, at 00:15, reed kotler wrote:
> There was some confusion on the llvm list because some tests were run on
> targets that did not support the naked attribute.
>
> I think we are thinking now that the return statement should not be emitted
> unless explicitly requested.
>
> It's
On 05/02/2013 09:06 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, reed kotler wrote:
On 05/02/2013 07:54 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
I vote yes.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, reed kotler wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 07:54 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
>>>
>>> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
>>> attribute.
>>
>> I vote yes.
>
> why would you want that?
On 05/02/2013 08:41 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/5/3 reed kotler :
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
various
gcc compilers.
IMHO, it depends on how you define the word 'nake
On 05/02/2013 07:54 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
I vote yes.
why would you want that? naked functions are just inline asm.
you can generate your own return statem
2013/5/3 reed kotler :
> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
> attribute.
>
> There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
> various
> gcc compilers.
>
IMHO, it depends on how you define the word 'naked' for a function
and how you expe
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
> attribute.
I vote yes.
> There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
> various
> gcc compilers.
Which targets do not generate a return instr
On 05/02/2013 04:16 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM, reed kotler wrote:
On 05/02/2013 03:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM, reed kotler wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 03:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
>>
>> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
>> attribute.
>>
>> There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between
>> various
>> gcc compilers.
>>
On 05/02/2013 03:44 PM, reed kotler wrote:
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement
between various
gcc compilers.
Sorry. This was meant to be a question.
Should a return statement be
Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked
attribute.
There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement
between various
gcc compilers.
13 matches
Mail list logo