Re: regeneration of files

2006-10-31 Thread Mike Stump
On Oct 29, 2006, at 9:49 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: Mike> libjava/configure I updated (svn trunk) and re-ran autoconf here, and didn't see any change. Hum, I don't know off-hand if your autoconf 2.59 isn't quite 2.59, or mine is strange, or I'm getting some sort of cross pollution or you are.

Re: regeneration of files

2006-10-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Mike" == Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> I found quite a few files out of date... [...] Mike> libjava/configure I updated (svn trunk) and re-ran autoconf here, and didn't see any change. What version of autoconf are you using? I'm using the 2.59 that comes with FC5. Mike>

Re: regeneration of files

2006-10-29 Thread FX Coudert
I commited the regenerated libgfortran files on mainline (rev. 118140): 2006-10-29 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure: Regenerate. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. * aclocal.m4: Regenerate. Maybe you have an old version of libgfortran/config.h.in, becaus

Re: regeneration of files

2006-10-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Oct 28, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Mike Stump wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Mike Stump wrote: The ones that were of particular interest were the libgfortran ones, Jack was trying to build on a G4 and had hopes they might fix his build. Jack confirms that a regeneration of libgfortran fixe

Re: regeneration of files

2006-10-27 Thread Mike Stump
On Oct 26, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Mike Stump wrote: The ones that were of particular interest were the libgfortran ones, Jack was trying to build on a G4 and had hopes they might fix his build. Jack confirms that a regeneration of libgfortran fixed his build. He also reports that boehm-gc has