Le Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:33:23PM -0500, David Fang écrivait/wrote:
> > > > I made some suggestions on the Wiki
> > > >
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> > > >
> > > > Again, feel free to edit the above page (and/or incorporate parts of
> > > > it into the documentation).
>
> > > I made some suggestions on the Wiki
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> > >
> > > Again, feel free to edit the above page (and/or incorporate parts of
> > > it into the documentation).
Looks like it was relocated to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configur
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
But I still cannot figure out how to regenerate *reliably*
My take, aside from the top level, you enable maintainer mode and
type make with 2.59 in your path. If it fails to work, file a bug
report. For the top level, you should ha
Le Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 03:00:21PM -0500, David Fang écrivait/wrote:
> > I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
> > GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
> > (like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
> >
> > I made some su
> I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
> GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
> (like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
>
> I made some suggestions on the Wiki
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
>
>
>
Dear all,
I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
(like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
I made some suggestions on the Wiki
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
Agai
