this looks good to me. does your patch also address the vec_concat
issue that marc raised?
On 01/26/2013 09:59 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: Kenneth Zadeck
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:19:40 +0100
the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
i have seen examples w
> From: Kenneth Zadeck
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:19:40 +0100
> the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
>
> i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should
> the doc be "small vector or scalar"?
Yes. This patch has been sitting in a tree
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should the
doc be "small vector or scalar"?
That might even be the majority of cases. Note that vec_concat is in
the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should
the doc be "small vector or scalar"?
kenny
