On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Conrad S wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Only if you don't read the pages properly.
>> "Important: GCC's support for C++11 is still experimental. "
>> "GCC provides experimental support for the 2011 ISO C++ standard."
>> Anyway, removing it from the list would a
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Only if you don't read the pages properly.
> "Important: GCC's support for C++11 is still experimental. "
> "GCC provides experimental support for the 2011 ISO C++ standard."
> Anyway, removing it from the list would achieve nothing.
Eh? thread_local doesn't work. Stating
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> .. if you are willing to concretely help, please open a meta-bug with
> "[meta-bug] thread_local" in the summary and blocked by all the issues you
> mentioned.
Done:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
.. if you are willing to concretely help, please open a meta-bug with
"[meta-bug] thread_local" in the summary and blocked by all the issues
you mentioned.
Thanks,
Paolo.
On 30 January 2014 13:40, Conrad S wrote:
> The page covering C++0x/C++11 support in GCC, ie.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
> states that the "thread_local" keyword is supported since GCC 4.8.
>
> However, thread_local is currently (gcc 4.8.2) too broken to be of real use:
> http://gcc.g
The page covering C++0x/C++11 support in GCC, ie.
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
states that the "thread_local" keyword is supported since GCC 4.8.
However, thread_local is currently (gcc 4.8.2) too broken to be of real use:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59364
http://gcc.gnu.
