R Hill wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 7/14/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As subject says - on x86_64 it takes a whopping 30 minutes to
compile said with -fprofile-generate!
It's caused by -frename-registers enabled by -funroll-loops. Compiling
with -O2 -fno-unroll-loops
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 7/14/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As subject says - on x86_64 it takes a whopping 30 minutes to
compile said with -fprofile-generate!
It's caused by -frename-registers enabled by -funroll-loops. Compiling
with -O2 -fno-unroll-loops -fprofile-gener
On 7/14/05, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As subject says - on x86_64 it takes a whopping 30 minutes to
> compile said with -fprofile-generate!
It's caused by -frename-registers enabled by -funroll-loops. Compiling
with -O2 -fno-unroll-loops -fprofile-generate compared to -O2 -
As subject says - on x86_64 it takes a whopping 30 minutes to
compile said with -fprofile-generate! And of course profiledbootstrap
later fails with
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g
-O2 -fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Ww
