> Currently I'm testing the patch below, which simply invalidates the
> load/store. Now I need some help from someone, who is more familiar with
> this code, whether this is the correct approach.
I don't see any other solution than invalidating the MEM.
> Index: gcc/gcse.c
> =
Hi,
I have a problem with 4.1 on m68k-linux, which miscompiles the following
test case during the gcse pass:
struct b {
unsigned a : 1;
unsigned b : 1;
unsigned c : 1;
unsigned d : 1;
};
unsigned int x = 1;
void f(int y, struct b *p)
{
switch (y)
