Re: pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register

2015-05-17 Thread Oleg Endo
On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 11:09 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/17/2015 10:21 AM, Jon Beniston wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The gccint docs for pre_modify/post_modify say that the address modifier > > must be one of three forms: > > > > (plus:m x z), (minus:m x z), or (plus:m x i), where z is an index registe

Re: pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register

2015-05-17 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/17/2015 10:21 AM, Jon Beniston wrote: Hi, The gccint docs for pre_modify/post_modify say that the address modifier must be one of three forms: (plus:m x z), (minus:m x z), or (plus:m x i), where z is an index register and i is a constant. Why isn’t (plus:m x (mult:m z i)) supported, for

pre_modify/post_modify with scaled register

2015-05-17 Thread Jon Beniston
Hi, The gccint docs for pre_modify/post_modify say that the address modifier must be one of three forms: (plus:m x z), (minus:m x z), or (plus:m x i), where z is an index register and i is a constant. Why isn’t (plus:m x (mult:m z i)) supported, for architectures that support scaling of the inde