On 12/10/2014 05:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 12/04/2014 01:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Apart from what Joseph already said using 'sizetype' in the middle-end
>>> for sizes and offsets is really really deep-rooted into the comp
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 01:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Apart from what Joseph already said using 'sizetype' in the middle-end
>> for sizes and offsets is really really deep-rooted into the compiler.
>> What you see above is one aspect - POINTER
On 12/04/2014 01:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Apart from what Joseph already said using 'sizetype' in the middle-end
> for sizes and offsets is really really deep-rooted into the compiler.
> What you see above is one aspect - POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offsets
> are forced to have sizetype type. But you'
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:34 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> If a target (rl78-elf in my case) has a named address space larger
> than the generic address space (__far in my case), why is pointer math
> in that named address space still truncated to sizetype?
>
> N1275 recognizes that named address spac
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > However, pointer subtraction still returns ptrdiff_t, and sizeof still
> > returns size_t,
>
> Why?
Well, TR 18037 doesn't do anything to change that, so if you define some
target-specific way to use different types in certain circumstances then
you'r
> However, pointer subtraction still returns ptrdiff_t, and sizeof still
> returns size_t,
Why?
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
> If a target (rl78-elf in my case) has a named address space larger
> than the generic address space (__far in my case), why is pointer math
> in that named address space still truncated to sizetype?
>
> N1275 recognizes that named address spaces might be a
If a target (rl78-elf in my case) has a named address space larger
than the generic address space (__far in my case), why is pointer math
in that named address space still truncated to sizetype?
N1275 recognizes that named address spaces might be a different size
than the generic address space, b
