Diego Novillo wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 15:27, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, absolutely. The problem, as usual, is lack of time. Our
standards for internal documentation are pretty bad and the set of
people writing the documentation is always different than the set
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 15:27, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that passes are central to the middle end in GCC, shouldn't we want
> each of them (without exception!) be described by at least a simple
> paragraph. I'm sure that is a small effort for each pass writer (he/she
Hello All,
I have a wish: that each (middle-end) pass [those in gcc/tree-passes.h]
would have a small documentation describing it (in particular which
representations, TREE, SSA, CFG, etc... are valid after the pass). A
simple wiki page (describing each pass) would be more than enough for
me.
