On 08/28/2017 09:46 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> operand_equal_p() doesn't handle SSA_NAMEs and returns false for
>> operands in that form even when they have equal values (when both
>> are ADDR_EXPR of the same decl). Yet the function is exte
On 08/28/2017 08:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> operand_equal_p() doesn't handle SSA_NAMEs and returns false for
> operands in that form even when they have equal values (when both
> are ADDR_EXPR of the same decl). Yet the function is extensively
> relied on in the middle end where I would expect i
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> operand_equal_p() doesn't handle SSA_NAMEs and returns false for
> operands in that form even when they have equal values (when both
> are ADDR_EXPR of the same decl). Yet the function is extensively
> relied on in the middle end where I woul
operand_equal_p() doesn't handle SSA_NAMEs and returns false for
operands in that form even when they have equal values (when both
are ADDR_EXPR of the same decl). Yet the function is extensively
relied on in the middle end where I would expect it be beneficial
to have it handle SSA_NAMEs. At a
