Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-13 Thread Eric Christopher
Eric, Do you mean that they're noisy because of the WARNINGs? I always find warnings annoying, perhaps test_summary should filter them out. Yeah, that's what I meant. Notice that for -m32, the message from the linker includes "In function `main':"; this causes prune_gcc_output to remove tha

Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-13 Thread Janis Johnson
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > > > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both > > > > x86_64-darwin

Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-13 Thread Janis Johnson
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > > > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both > > > > x86_64-darwin

Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-12 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both > > > x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working > > > executable > > > a

Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-12 Thread Eric Christopher
Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With

Re: noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-12 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote: > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both > x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable > and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With > link only they do

noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

2006-09-12 Thread Eric Christopher
So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With link only they do manage to be quiet in the logs and we'll still not