2009/4/28 H.J. Lu :
> 2009/4/27 Ben Elliston :
>> On Manuel's recommendation, I have backed out revision 145102 for the
>> time being. If someone wishes to have another go at it, the code is in
>> svn.
>>
>> Cheers, Ben
>
> You should use "patch -E" apply any patches. I checked in revision 14689
>
2009/4/27 Ben Elliston :
> On Manuel's recommendation, I have backed out revision 145102 for the
> time being. If someone wishes to have another go at it, the code is in
> svn.
>
> Cheers, Ben
You should use "patch -E" apply any patches. I checked in revision 14689
to remove the empty g++.dg/war
On Manuel's recommendation, I have backed out revision 145102 for the
time being. If someone wishes to have another go at it, the code is in
svn.
Cheers, Ben
--
Ben Elliston
Australia Development Lab, IBM
Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
> I authored the patch, HJ just committed it. I cannot think any trivial
> way to fix this and I don't have much time to investigate. The PR is
> already reopened, so I think the patch should be reverted. Probably we
> warn too early now but the above testcase seems sp
2009/4/23 Ben Elliston :
> Hi HJ
>
> According to svn annotate, it was you who authored the new 'offset
> outside bounds of constant string warning' warning in GCC (well, I think
> so, anyway). The compiler now complains about some code in the C++
> demangler:
&g
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:50:12PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> According to svn annotate, it was you who authored the new 'offset
> outside bounds of constant string warning' warning in GCC (well, I think
> so, anyway). The compiler now complains about some code in
Hi HJ
According to svn annotate, it was you who authored the new 'offset
outside bounds of constant string warning' warning in GCC (well, I think
so, anyway). The compiler now complains about some code in the C++
demangler:
/home/bje/source/gcc-trunk/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:2651: warni
