> I don't know about using reference types, but there are several math
> builtins that "return" multiple values, the extra ones via pointer
> arguments. E.g. see frexp, lgamma_r, modf, remquo and/or sincos.
Like I said, I'm kinda locked into the syntax. People have been using
these builtins for
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Could someone provide a hint for me? I'm trying to put in "real"
> prototypes for a builtin function where the arguments don't follow the
> default promotion rules. Specifically, one of the arguments is a
> reference type (like C++'s "int&"). However, I'm
I'm hoping I can get it to do what I want, if only I can get the MI to
treat the function definition given to it by the target as the one
true definition, and not just some advisory one.
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a trick to this? I need this type of functionality because
> some builtins modify multiple values, so a simple return value is
> insufficient, plus this worked with older versions of gcc so our users
> are used to it syntax-wise.
I've never found
Could someone provide a hint for me? I'm trying to put in "real"
prototypes for a builtin function where the arguments don't follow the
default promotion rules. Specifically, one of the arguments is a
reference type (like C++'s "int&"). However, I'm bumping into two
problems:
1. The compiler e
