Thanks for measuring these.
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> For bzip2 trunk regress badly in performance against 4.3.2
> but n32 is indeed relatively faster than 32 (still slower than 4.3.2).
> For gzip trunk matches 4.3.2 but n32 is slower than 32 and 64 even
> slower.
Last time I checked (on Octeon)
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:04 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> When I did some performance measurements a few years back -- probably
> on a VR413x -- n32 did give a noticeable improvement over o32.
For the fun of it I did some tests on gzip and bzip2 (sources
patched debian lenny - except for bzip2
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:02 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:04 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Laurent GUERBY writes:
> >>> I was wondering why mips64*-*-linux does not have the same
> >>> handling of multiarch as powerpc/sparc/x86 in gcc/config.
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:04 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Laurent GUERBY writes:
I was wondering why mips64*-*-linux does not have the same
handling of multiarch as powerpc/sparc/x86 in gcc/config.gcc:
32 bits compiler binaries with 32/64 target choice via "-m", --with-
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:04 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY writes:
> > I was wondering why mips64*-*-linux does not have the same
> > handling of multiarch as powerpc/sparc/x86 in gcc/config.gcc:
> > 32 bits compiler binaries with 32/64 target choice via "-m", --with-cpu
> > and
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> I was wondering why mips64*-*-linux does not have the same
> handling of multiarch as powerpc/sparc/x86 in gcc/config.gcc:
> 32 bits compiler binaries with 32/64 target choice via "-m", --with-cpu
> and --enable-targets support for configure. Is there any specific reason
>
Hi,
I was wondering why mips64*-*-linux does not have the same
handling of multiarch as powerpc/sparc/x86 in gcc/config.gcc:
32 bits compiler binaries with 32/64 target choice via "-m", --with-cpu
and --enable-targets support for configure. Is there any specific reason
for this?
If reason is "jus