Re: makeinfo version required (was: define_constraints patch, re-revised)

2006-02-28 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:02:03PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > That said, I don't really disagree about enforcing proper prerequisites to > build GCC and its documentation, my question in this case, and in general, > just is: Can the issue which we encountered be worked around in a simple > wa

makeinfo version required (was: define_constraints patch, re-revised)

2006-02-28 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
[ gcc-patches -> gcc ] On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> That said, I guess it's fine to ignore the ones with makeinfo 4.5, >> but based on my checks I'd be rather hesitant for us to require >> anything later than 4.6. > I don't think we should tie our own hands in this way. Building G