On Thursday 17 November 2005 15:20, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:12:50 +
> >
> > > ../../../gcc-head-test/libiberty/regex.c:7699 (set (reg:SI 2 %d2)
> > >
> > >(sign_extend:SI (reg:HI 1 %d1 [59]))) 65 {*68k_extendhisi2}
> From: Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:12:50 +
> > ../../../gcc-head-test/libiberty/regex.c:7699 (set (reg:SI 2 %d2)
> >
> >(sign_extend:SI (reg:HI 1 %d1 [59]))) 65 {*68k_extendhisi2} (nil)
> >(nil))
> > ../../../gcc-head-test/lib
> ../../../gcc-head-test/libiberty/regex.c: In function
> 'byte_common_op_match_null_string_p':
>
> ../../../gcc-head-test/libiberty/regex.c:7724: error: insn does not
> satisfy its constraints:
> (insn 158 85 159 8
> ../../../gcc-head-test/libiberty/regex.c:7699 (set
Doing an overnight build of all rtems targets, I can across this
new breakage for m68k-rtems4.7. I last built this target on Nov 3
from the head and it compiled then.
/home/joel/gcc-work/head/b-m68k-rtems4.7/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/gcc-work/head/b-m68k-rtems4.7/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/home/joel/
