Re: lto-plugin: mismatch between ld's architecture and GCC's configure --host

2013-10-15 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:15:41 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > I suppose nobody thought of this but I wouldn't call it a scenario that > is desired to support either ;) Why not support this scenario? Have you seen the patches I posted yesterday? There are no changes for builds when not using

Re: lto-plugin: mismatch between ld's architecture and GCC's configure --host

2013-10-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > This is a bit of a weird scenario -- but it is supposed to work fine in > my opinion (but doesn't). > > I have a GNU toolchain as 32-bit x86 GNU/Linux executables, configured to > to generate code for 32-bit x86 by default, and usi

lto-plugin: mismatch between ld's architecture and GCC's configure --host

2013-10-12 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! This is a bit of a weird scenario -- but it is supposed to work fine in my opinion (but doesn't). I have a GNU toolchain as 32-bit x86 GNU/Linux executables, configured to to generate code for 32-bit x86 by default, and using -m64 for x86_64. This toolchain I'm using on a x86_64 system (whic