On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> [PR c/51527]
>>
>> I think the fix would be sth like
>>
>> Index: gcc/convert.c
>> ===
>> --- gcc/convert.c (revision 186871)
>> +++ gcc/conve
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> [PR c/51527]
>>
>> I think the fix would be sth like
>>
>> Index: gcc/convert.c
>> ===
>> --- gcc/convert.c (revision 186871)
>> +++ gcc/conv
Richard Guenther wrote:
> [PR c/51527]
>
> I think the fix would be sth like
>
> Index: gcc/convert.c
> ===
> --- gcc/convert.c (revision 186871)
> +++ gcc/convert.c (working copy)
> @@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ convert_to_integer
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR51527
>>
>> It works with 4.8 trunk but crash
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>> Richard Guenther wrote:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> [...]
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR51527
>
> It works with 4.8 trunk but crashes with 4.7.
> Did not yet track what changes made it work with 4
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
>> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
>> apprecia
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
> appreciate a hint. With this code:
>
> typedef long int __attri
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
appreciate a hint. With this code:
typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>>> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
>>> appreciate a hint. With this code:
>>>
>>> typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
>>> int20_t xi;
>>> int20_t addit
Richard Guenther wrote:
>> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
>> appreciate a hint. With this code:
>>
>> typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
>> int20_t xi;
>> int20_t addit () { xi += 0x54321L; }
>>
>> xi ends up in mode PSImode, which is a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Peter Bigot wrote:
>> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
>> appreciate a hint. With this code:
>>
>> typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
>> int20_t xi
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Peter Bigot wrote:
> I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
> appreciate a hint. With this code:
>
> typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
> int20_t xi;
> int20_t addit () { xi += 0x54321L; }
>
> xi ends up in mode
I've run into another issue supporting a 20-bit integer for which I'd
appreciate a hint. With this code:
typedef long int __attribute__((__a20__)) int20_t;
int20_t xi;
int20_t addit () { xi += 0x54321L; }
xi ends up in mode PSImode, which is a MODE_PARTIAL_INT with 20 bits of
precision and
13 matches
Mail list logo