> Ben Elliston writes:
Ben> What should be done with the license of new source files in the
Ben> meantime?
New source files that require exception language should use the
current license and exception language present in other files.
Thanks, David
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 20:06 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Ben> What is the status of this? Is it okay to submit new source files (to
> Ben> be compiled into libgcc), under the same terms as the existing libgcc
> Ben> source files?
>
> This is as directed by the FSF until new exception lan
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:06:52PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Ben Elliston writes:
>
> Ben> I see that the source files compiled into libgcc are still licensed
> Ben> under GPLv2+exception and that these have not yet been converted to
> Ben> GPLv3 of any description.
>
> Ben> What is th
> Ben Elliston writes:
Ben> I see that the source files compiled into libgcc are still licensed
Ben> under GPLv2+exception and that these have not yet been converted to
Ben> GPLv3 of any description.
Ben> What is the status of this? Is it okay to submit new source files (to
Ben> be compiled
I see that the source files compiled into libgcc are still licensed
under GPLv2+exception and that these have not yet been converted to
GPLv3 of any description.
What is the status of this? Is it okay to submit new source files (to
be compiled into libgcc), under the same terms as the existing li
