Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-03 Thread Dave Korn
On 02/03/2011 21:37, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Jack Howarth wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:08:22PM CET: >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:16:19AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> Jack, the actual issue you're seeing might well be the result of some >>> missing dependency. With parallel build failu

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jack Howarth wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:08:22PM CET: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:16:19AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Jack, the actual issue you're seeing might well be the result of some > > missing dependency. With parallel build failures, it is most important > > to see output fro

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-02 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:16:19AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Dave, > > * Dave Korn wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:28:15AM CET: > > http://mad-scientist.net/make/autodep.html > > > > although note that where that recommends using "-include" (under > > "Avoiding ``No rule to make

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dave, * Dave Korn wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:28:15AM CET: > http://mad-scientist.net/make/autodep.html > > although note that where that recommends using "-include" (under > "Avoiding ``No rule to make target ...'' Errors") to ignore would-be > errors from trying to include non-e

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Dave Korn
On 02/03/2011 05:10, Jack Howarth wrote: >I tried again without --enable-build-with-cxx and it worked. I'll see if I > can > reproduce it again with --enable-build-with-cxx. Bizarre. Can't see how that would be related, but you never know what kind of odd knock-on effects a bug can have..

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:58:41AM +, Dave Korn wrote: > On 02/03/2011 03:23, Jack Howarth wrote: > >Is anyone else building java with lto-bootstrap? At r170606 I am seeing > > a bootstrap > > failure which appears as... > > > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/gij.Plo'. Stop. >

Re: new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Dave Korn
On 02/03/2011 03:23, Jack Howarth wrote: >Is anyone else building java with lto-bootstrap? At r170606 I am seeing a > bootstrap > failure which appears as... > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/gij.Plo'. Stop. > make[3]: *** [all-multi] Error 2 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished

new libjava bootstrap failure

2011-03-01 Thread Jack Howarth
Is anyone else building java with lto-bootstrap? At r170606 I am seeing a bootstrap failure which appears as... /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir

Re: libjava bootstrap failure

2006-01-13 Thread Andreas Tobler
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: When bootstrapping gcc revision 109670 in a i486-linux-gnu, libjava compilation fails. I was able to reduce the problem to the generated cc1plus producing an internal compiler error when compiling: namespace java { class Object; } bool _Jv_ObjectCheckMonitor

libjava bootstrap failure

2006-01-13 Thread Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
When bootstrapping gcc revision 109670 in a i486-linux-gnu, libjava compilation fails. I was able to reduce the problem to the generated cc1plus producing an internal compiler error when compiling: namespace java { class Object; } bool _Jv_ObjectCheckMonitor (int obj); class java::Object {