Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > > > > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > > > > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > > > > > > > Is this as expected? > > Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL

Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > > > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > > > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > > > > > Is this as expected? Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes. Peter: > > > Are the

Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > > > Is this as expected? > > Yes. > > > Are the 2 libraries c

Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > Is this as expected? Yes. > Are the 2 libraries compatible? Interchangeable? Looking in the map > file, I don'

libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). Is this as expected? Are the 2 libraries compatible? Interchangeable? Looking in the map file, I don't think so. If not, how can I make the most correct separation for a 3.4 and 4.0