Peter Bigot writes:
> I'm updating the machine description for a 16-bit microcontroller, and am
> trying to eliminate some hand-coded SImode and DImode insns because in
> general gcc generates better code automatically. So far, I've found no case
> where I seem to need to implement cbranchsi4 or
I'm updating the machine description for a 16-bit microcontroller, and am
trying to eliminate some hand-coded SImode and DImode insns because in
general gcc generates better code automatically. So far, I've found no case
where I seem to need to implement cbranchsi4 or cbranchdi4.
However, gcc doe
