Re: libgcc-std.ver question

2005-03-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 17, 2005, at 4:27 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: I suppose it would be ok, but it would only be relevent for embedded targets where "int" < SImode. Otherwise we use the plain "ffs" symbol in libc. Ah, ok, that falls into the don't care bin for me... For them, they probably don't use shared

Re: libgcc-std.ver question

2005-03-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:43:32PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > I have a question about libgcc export for shared libraries... libgcc > exports (via libgcc-std.ver): > > __ffsdi2 > > but not: > > __ffssi2 I suppose it would be ok, but it would only be relevent for embedded targets where "int

libgcc-std.ver question

2005-03-16 Thread Mike Stump
I have a question about libgcc export for shared libraries... libgcc exports (via libgcc-std.ver): __ffsdi2 but not: __ffssi2 . Is there any particular motivation not to, or should it, or, does it just not matter a whole lot? If people think it would be good to do, I'd be happy to do up