On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:06:29PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I'm sure something might need updating after this change and I am
> willing to try and fix anything I break, but I am not sure what other
> testing I can do with the platforms I have available. Do you have any
> suggestions as to what
> > Who maintains this automatic merge process?
>
> The man to ask about this is DJ Delorie. I'm not sure how much work it
> is on his part, though.
>
> Either way it would probably be best to do the initial sync by hand.
> And is it really plausible that nothing in src would need updating for
>
> Was there not a way to combine the two (gcc and src) via console commands?
We're not talking about combining source trees for a build, we're
talking about making sure both source trees happen to have the same
sources in them to start with.
DJ Delorie wrote:
Who maintains this automatic merge process?
Me. I have a cron job that checks out gcc's and src's libiberty and
include, compares them, copies any differing files to src, and sends
me email. I then run a "do it" script to do the actual commit.
There's not much advantag
> Who maintains this automatic merge process?
Me. I have a cron job that checks out gcc's and src's libiberty and
include, compares them, copies any differing files to src, and sends
me email. I then run a "do it" script to do the actual commit.
There's not much advantage in using this setup f
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:36:22PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Can someone tell me about this automatic merge? I was going to submit a
> formal patch to change the contents of src/intl but it seems that if we
> have an automatic merge to copy libiberty from gcc to src, we could do
> the same for
> > What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use
> > the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about
> > whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so,
> > which one should be used?
>
> Yes, there should be a single version of i
> What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use
> the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about
> whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so,
> which one should be used?
FWIW, I have always given preference to the gcc versio
Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By removing the AM_PROG_INSTALL definition from aclocal.m4 I was able to
> run autoconf 2.59 on the src tree intl subdir with no problems but I was
> wondering if we should take the time to synchronize the GCC intl
> directory with the src tree intl direc
I sent this email earlier to just binutils and got no replies, so I
thought I would try broadening my scope:
While looking at updating the src tree to use newer versions of autoconf
I have run into the issue of the intl directory. I found some old
discussions about the two different versions (on
10 matches
Mail list logo
