George White wrote:
Frankly, I don't care what standards say is no longer acceptable
syntax.
The standards have existed for quite some time, giving you plenty of
time to get acquainted with the rules. Standards exist for a reason, and
if you choose not to follow them, it is not the fault of t
On Saturday 01 October 2005 01:02, George White wrote:
> Frankly, I don't care what standards say is no longer acceptable
> syntax.
I think this is a nice summary of your mail.
Fortunately, most of our users do care about this.
Gr.
Steven
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:02:07PM -0700, George White wrote:
> I would like to suggest that in the future you pay more attention
> to backwards computability. There have been at least 4 instances
> where you broke the compiler with regard to being able to compile
> legacy code.
The C standard t
George White wrote:
Frankly, I don't care what standards say is no longer acceptable
syntax.
Well it is a goal of gcc to be compatible with the standard. Really
it should be a goal of yours to make sure your code is correct, i.e.
that it conforms with the standard, and if you write incorrect
Hello,
I would like to suggest that in the future you pay more attention
to backwards computability. There have been at least 4 instances
where you broke the compiler with regard to being able to compile
legacy code. I have > 500K lines of older code which works perfectly
well and should not be
