[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I hope copyright assignment won't be neccessary, though, since the patch
>doesn't contain any
>large blocks of code outside of the testcases. It's just a lot of small,
>scattered changes. But if you think copyright assignment is neccessary,
>please tell me what I need to
Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Besides repeating again that personally I consider this effort very,
> very welcome, just wanted to restate (*) that probably you should take
> as baseline current *mainline*, not 4.0.0, because, of course, any
> possible patch will go in mainline only. Also obvious, in case
Hi Russell,
>Hi,
>
>I just wanted to let anyone who might interested know that there's an attempt
>underway to add support for rvalue references to G++. I've got a preliminary
>patch at http://russ.hn.org/rref/ which adds partial support for them, and I'm
>hoping to turn it into a complete impl
Hi,
I just wanted to let anyone who might interested know that there's an attempt
underway to add support for rvalue references to G++. I've got a preliminary
patch at http://russ.hn.org/rref/ which adds partial support for them, and I'm
hoping to turn it into a complete implementation over the
