Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Friday 08 April 2005 00:12, James E Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 04:35, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Try the patch below - does it fix the problem?
OK, I will try it. This may take about 2 days. My lone IA-64 machine
is busy doing other stuff at the moment.
With this pat
On Friday 08 April 2005 00:12, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 04:35, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Try the patch below - does it fix the problem?
>
> OK, I will try it. This may take about 2 days. My lone IA-64 machine
> is busy doing other stuff at the moment.
With this patch, I can b
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 04:35, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Try the patch below - does it fix the problem?
OK, I will try it. This may take about 2 days. My lone IA-64 machine
is busy doing other stuff at the moment.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com
(slowly catching up with vacation backlog)
James E Wilson wrote:
Reload is using registers without setting regs_ever_live. The IA-64
prologue code needs a temp register to save/restore b0, and it uses
regs_ever_live to find one. Also, because we have variable size
register windows, we need the
Steven Bosscher wrote:
Bootstrap with the reload-branch dies on ia64 in stage0 while
building unwind-ia64.c:
I needed one more minor patch to quiet a warning in reload.c, and I
couldn't help but notice that reload1.c is being compiled with -Wno-error.
Thhis got me all the way to a bootstrap compa
Steven Bosscher wrote:
../../reload-branch/gcc/unwind.inc:313: error: Attempt to delete
prologue/epilogue insn:
(insn/f 137 136 138 0 ../../reload-branch/gcc/unwind.inc:285 (set (reg:DI 33
r35)
(reg:DI 320 b0)) -1 (nil)
(nil))
Reload is using registers without setting regs_ever_live.
Hi,
Bootstrap with the reload-branch dies on ia64 in stage0 while
building unwind-ia64.c:
./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem
/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/abuild/stevenb/build/gcc/../ld
-O2 -DIN_G
