[gnu.org #2021668] Robert Joseph Dubner GCC, GDB

Hello, Your assignment/disclaimer process with the FSF is currently complete; your fully executed PDF will be sent to you in a separate email immediately following this one. Please remember to let us know when your employment status changes, as this may affect your assignment status. Thank you f

[gnu.org #2021668] Robert Joseph Dubner GCC, GDB

manner: gpg -a --detach-sig ASSIGNMENT Where ASSIGNMENT is the PDF file(s) as you have received it from us. Then simply email the assignment, key ID, and signature file back to us at ass...@gnu.org. Please make sure that your key is listed on a public keyserver. Remember, we can protect your work

[gnu.org #1926661] Revamped GCC Logo

Le Jeu 09 Mar 2023 05:36:06, godef...@free.fr a écrit : > Le Mer 08 Mar 2023 19:49:29, 4ed...@gmail.com a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > Attached is my modern take on the GCC logo. I hope the organization > > likes > > it and that it can be put to good use, and don't hesitate to follow > > up with > >

[gnu.org #1880318] Antoni Boucher, modified employer disclaimer

On 2023-02-28 17:44:55, boua...@zoho.com wrote: > Hi. > Here is the document signed. > Thank you. > My apologies, I was unexpectedly out the last couple of days. This has been resolved and you are clear to contribute with the new employer disclaimer in place. Thank you for your patience and I a

Re: Regarding gnu.org

Hi, So, what do you think? Regards, Mark Smith [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 07/29/22,

Regarding gnu.org

Hello , I am currently representing the sale of the following domain: *GNU .ai* I can share with you the pricing and other details. Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Mark Smith

gnu.org

Hello Jason, Do you have any interest in the domain “*JavaSource.com*”? Please let me know. Regards, Ellie +1 (385) 999-3081

Re: Security vulnerabilities affects core API authorization of gnu.org

Hi - > Does gnu.org has a bug bounty program or reporting bugs reward policy? You are not talking to gnu.org, you are talking to gcc.gnu.org admins. Maybe see webmast...@gnu.org. I am not aware of any sort of bug bounty in either site. - FChE

Re: Security vulnerabilities affects core API authorization of gnu.org

On 1/4/21 10:40 AM, Salah Mosbah wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Does gnu.org <http://gnu.org/> has a bug bounty program or reporting > bugs reward policy? I have no idea. jeff >

Re: Security vulnerabilities affects core API authorization of gnu.org

Hi Jeff, Does gnu.org has a bug bounty program or reporting bugs reward policy? On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:06 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 1/4/21 3:23 AM, Salah Mosbah via Gcc wrote: > > Hi Janus, > > > > How can I report some high impact security vulnerabilities that

Re: Security vulnerabilities affects core API authorization of gnu.org

On 1/4/21 3:23 AM, Salah Mosbah via Gcc wrote: > Hi Janus, > > How can I report some high impact security vulnerabilities that I have > found on gnu.org > web app? > > Also, does gnu.org has a bug bounty program or reporting bugs reward policy? > > The vulnerabilitie

Security vulnerabilities affects core API authorization of gnu.org

Hi Janus, How can I report some high impact security vulnerabilities that I have found on gnu.org web app? Also, does gnu.org has a bug bounty program or reporting bugs reward policy? The vulnerabilities that I have found affects the core API of gnu.org which allows unauthorized users to get

[gnu.org #1622724] Antoni Boucher GCC

Antoni, Your assignment/disclaimer process with the FSF is currently complete; your fully executed PDF will be sent to you in a separate email immediately following this one. Please remember to let us know when your employment status changes, as this may affect your assignment status. Thank you

[gnu.org #1622724] Antoni Boucher GCC

Antoni, Thank you so much for contributing. Please find the attached PDF(s) of your assignment(s) in the email after this one. Please print out the form, sign it, and then email a scanned copy in PDF format to or fax it to us at +1-617-542-2652. You can also send it to us via the postal mail i

[r...@gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]

<#part type=message/rfc822 disposition=inline raw=t> X-From-Line: r...@gnu.org Tue Feb 4 23:28:18 2020 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [209.51.188.10]) by localhost (mpop-1.0.28) with POP3 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:28:18 +0100 Return-path: Envelope

gcc【开--g...@gnu.org票】咨询客服QQ：89331971317:53

您好，我司我司可以代理各种税票（公司做账报税，业务出差报销等），票据可拿到当地税务验证，或者官网上查询后付款！咨询小林微信：UFO66808（微信同号） 林经理低点数就能【开-真-票】

[gnu.org #858034] Re: Broken links to online gcc manual

Jonathan Wakely writes: > On 21 September 2013 09:11, Niels Möller wrote: >> The page https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/ links to >> https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/onlinedocs/, which is dead (404 Not >> found). > > Works for me, I get a 302 redirect: After a night's sleep, I realize that most l

招 聘入职与试用期管 理策略gnu.org

企)业是否需要与法人代表}董事长{总经理{总裁签├�)动合同.xls Description: Binary data

[gnu.org #702521] Re: Romain Geissler copyright assignment

, then please put us in touch with a suitable representative of the school, so that we can negotiate what to do about it. Send a note about the issue to the school representative and to ass...@gnu.org. IMPORTANT: When you talk to the school representative, *no matter what instructions they have

Re: How to fix my account on gnu.org?

"H.J. Lu" writes: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Andreas Schwab > wrote: >> Ian Lance Taylor writes: >> >>> "H.J. Lu" writes: >>> >>>> I haven't used my gnu.org account for a long time, h...@gnu.org.  I can'

Re: How to fix my account on gnu.org?

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > >> "H.J. Lu" writes: >> >>> I haven't used my gnu.org account for a long time, h...@gnu.org.  I can't >>> log in >>> nor my email for

Re: How to fix my account on gnu.org?

Ian Lance Taylor writes: > "H.J. Lu" writes: > >> I haven't used my gnu.org account for a long time, h...@gnu.org. I can't >> log in >> nor my email forward doesn't work either. > > You are asking about gnu.org, not gcc.gnu.org, right?

Re: How to fix my account on gnu.org?

"H.J. Lu" writes: > I haven't used my gnu.org account for a long time, h...@gnu.org. I can't log > in > nor my email forward doesn't work either. You are asking about gnu.org, not gcc.gnu.org, right? I think you have to ask sysad...@gnu.org about that. Nor

How to fix my account on gnu.org?

Hi, I haven't used my gnu.org account for a long time, h...@gnu.org. I can't log in nor my email forward doesn't work either. -- H.J.

Re: [sysad...@gnu.org: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-h...@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning]]

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:12:45PM -0700, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Not sure where to send this, who is responsible for the mail server > for gcc.gnu.org? The admins can be reached at overse...@gcc.gnu.org .

[sysad...@gnu.org: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-h...@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning]]

Not sure where to send this, who is responsible for the mail server for gcc.gnu.org? --- Start of forwarded message --- Subject: [gnu.org #572859] [gcc-bugs-h...@gcc.gnu.org: ezmlm warning] From: "Ward Vandewege via RT" To: a...@gnu.org Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:2

Re: problem posting to gdb-patc...@gnu.org

"g...@cyberfiber.org" writes: > can someone please comment? 1) This is definitely the wrong mailing list. Try sysad...@gnu.org. 2) Nobody can help you without much more information, like exactly what you tried to do and exactly what happened. 3) You probably want gdb-patc...@s

problem posting to gdb-patc...@gnu.org

can someone please comment? greetz, michael

[gnu.org #263454] Re: Headsup: Rogue or hacked account spamming via RT? re: [gnu.org #263454]

Hi Dave. It was me who, in a mistake (I wanted to delete them) marked those tickets as "Opened". Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Jose E. Marchesi GNU Project http://www.gnu.org

Re: Headsup: Rogue or hacked account spamming via RT? re: [gnu.org #263454]

ts on the GCC mailing list with the subject line > "[gnu.org #263454] Take home $204,000.00 this month": > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00650.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00651.html > > and according to the headers (visible by the "raw text

Headsup: Rogue or hacked account spamming via RT? re: [gnu.org #263454]

Hello GNU webmasters, I hope this is the right place to report what appears to be a problem at rt.gnu.org, I couldn't find an explicit contact address for it. We just got two posts on the GCC mailing list with the subject line "[gnu.org #263454] Take home $204,000.00 this mon

Headsup: Rogue or hacked account spamming via RT? re: [gnu.org #263454]

Hello GNU webmasters, I hope this is the right place to report what appears to be a problem at rt.gnu.org, I couldn't find an explicit contact address for it. We just got two posts on the GCC mailing list with the subject line "[gnu.org #263454] Take home $204,000.00 this mon

Re: Updating gnu.org/software Fortran Page

Rob, On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Rob Myers wrote: > The gnu.org webmaster team are going to be updating all the pages in the > gnu.org/software subdirectory, which includes - > > http://www.gnu.org/software/fortran > > This will involve changing the design of the page to match

Re: [gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online

2009/6/23 Rob Myers via RT: >> >> In the page of the libstdc++ manual about the API documentation: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/api.html >> the link to "the latest collection" goes to a "404 Not Found" > > Hi. > > I'm forwarding you this email that was assigned to gnu webmasters for >

[gnu.org #456639] broken link in libstdc++ manual online

> [spoon.reloa...@gmail.com - Sun Jun 21 16:20:11 2009]: > > In the page of the libstdc++ manual about the API documentation: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/api.html > the link to "the latest collection" goes to a "404 Not Found" Hi. I'm forwarding you this email that was assigned to

Updating gnu.org/software Fortran Page

Hi. The gnu.org webmaster team are going to be updating all the pages in the gnu.org/software subdirectory, which includes - http://www.gnu.org/software/fortran This will involve changing the design of the page to match the new style of gnu.org, and updating the information about the GNU

Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

Hello, It too is possible that you have completed your assignment process with the FSF, but have yet to be removed from the list of outstanding assignments. If this is the case please let me know so that I can update the record. This is the case: I have had a copyright assignment on file for a

Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Hui-May Chang via RT wrote: > I thought I have completed it earlier. Can you check for me? Thanks! Don't worry, they just spammed the entire list with a seemingly off- list issue I think they just meant to ping Francois.

Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Hui-May Chang via RT wrote: > I thought I have completed it earlier. Can you check for me? Thanks! Don't worry, they just spammed the entire list with a seemingly off- list issue I think they just meant to ping Francois.

Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Hui-May Chang via RT wrote: I thought I have completed it earlier. Can you check for me? Thanks! Don't worry, they just spammed the entire list with a seemingly off- list issue I think they just meant to ping Francois.

Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

I thought I have completed it earlier. Can you check for me? Thanks! Hui-May Chang On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Jonas Jacobson via RT wrote: > Hello, > > This email is to follow up on your communication with the Free > Software > Foundation. Previously, you had expressed interest in contributin

[gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment

Hello, This email is to follow up on your communication with the Free Software Foundation. Previously, you had expressed interest in contributing to the GNU Project. If this is still the case please respond so that we can move the process along. If you did not receive the assignment please let us

Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10

Hi Richard, Thanks for the info. I'll ask my OS vendor. Thanks and Regards Stephen K. Gadde Original message >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:56:51 +0200 >From: "Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compile

Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10

On 6/11/07, Krupa Stephen Gadde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Can I get any help on this??? This is not the right place to ask either. Please ask your OS vendor (SUSE/Novell) on how to get Java compilers. Richard.

FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10

Hi, Can I get any help on this??? Thanks in advance Regards, Stephen K. Gadde -Original Message- From: Jeanne Rasata via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 7:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for

Re: [gnu.org #304614] Translation of gcc.gnu.org

Hello GCC folks, I'm the coordinator of GNU Chinese translation team. Recently some Chinese volunteers showed their interest in gcc.gnu.org, including the translation of website, document, etc. Before kicking off the translation task, I'd know the following information. 1) Is there already a

Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1.

"Daniel S. Wilkerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All I want to know is can I consider the file at this URL to be the > official version of gcc 2.8.1: > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-2.8.1.tar.gz Yes, that is the official version of gcc 2.8.1. This does not constitute legal advice, and whether

Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1.

Zak Greant via RT wrote: On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:22PDT (CA), Daniel S. Wilkerson via RT wrote: Could you please provide me with a URL to an offical copy of gcc 2.8.1? I just need to check that some code we wrote that used to be intimately connected with that version of gcc no longer conta

Re: [gnu.org #283065] Confirming the mailing of your assignment

Hi Jonas, Thanks for this confirmation. To accelerate my processing of these papers, would it be possible to already have an electronic version of them by e-mail? Even a generic version would be ok. This way, I can sign and return you the paper copy as soon as I get it. Cheers, Nic. On Thu, 2006

[gnu.org #283065] Confirming the mailing of your assignment

Hello Nic, Thank you for contributing to GNU software. We'll send you the appropriate papers through the post Please sign and return the original in the envelope provided. Once the FSF has signed it, we will send you a digital copy in pdf format for your records. If your employment status cha

Re: [gnu.org #282142] Copyright assignment for GCC Hello World

On 3/27/06, David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure why the copyright clerk forwarded this to the > general GCC mailinglist instead of helping you obtain an assignment form, > but we can proceed anyway. I don't mind :-) > Do you work for any university or compan

Re: [gnu.org #282142] Copyright assignment for GCC Hello World

I am not sure why the copyright clerk forwarded this to the general GCC mailinglist instead of helping you obtain an assignment form, but we can proceed anyway. Do you work for any university or company that could claim ownership of your code? If no, you directly can assign your c

[gnu.org #282142] Copyright assignment for GCC Hello World

Hello Gustavo, I have cc'ed the GCC Maintainership committee. They'll tell you what steps you need to take for your patch. Thanks for contributing. All the best, Jonas Jacobson Copyright Administrator Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor Boston, MA 02110 Phone +1-617-542-594

Re: [gnu.org #225214] apparent mistake in html attribute

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, John Sullivan via RT wrote: > I'm doing some housecleaning, and thought I should pass on this rather > old message to you that we received in the GNU Webmasters queue about > the sidebar on your web pages. > > Can someone acknowledge this? Thanks! Acknowledged. I installed t

[gnu.org #225214] apparent mistake in html attribute

Hello GCC Team, I'm doing some housecleaning, and thought I should pass on this rather old message to you that we received in the GNU Webmasters queue about the sidebar on your web pages. Can someone acknowledge this? Thanks! -- John Sullivan GNU Chief Webmaster > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Mar 0

[gnu.org #272999] Gcc installation help

Hi, I'm sorry, but as this is only a general contact address, I cannot properly answer technical questions such as yours. The best I can do is refer you to the GCC Manual (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/) and Frequently Asked Questions (http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html). If neither of those provide an

Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Hi Gerald, > Tomas, > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Tomas Bily via RT wrote: > > I filled and posted FSF assignment (with an employer disclaimer) back > > to FSF via mail half year ago. Did you received it ? > > I found the following in the copyright file on the FSF network: > > GCC Tomas Bily

Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Tomas, On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Tomas Bily via RT wrote: > I filled and posted FSF assignment (with an employer disclaimer) back > to FSF via mail half year ago. Did you received it ? I found the following in the copyright file on the FSF network: GCC Tomas Bily United States 2005-

Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Tomas, On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Tomas Bily via RT wrote: > I filled and posted FSF assignment (with an employer disclaimer) back > to FSF via mail half year ago. Did you received it ? I found the following in the copyright file on the FSF network: GCC Tomas Bily United States 2005-

Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Tomas, On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Tomas Bily via RT wrote: > I filled and posted FSF assignment (with an employer disclaimer) back > to FSF via mail half year ago. Did you received it ? I found the following in the copyright file on the FSF network: GCC Tomas Bily United States 2005-

Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Hello, I filled and posted FSF assignment (with an employer disclaimer) back to FSF via mail half year ago. Did you received it ? Best Regards Tomas Bily > Hello, > > This email is to follow up on your communication with the Free Software > Foundation. Previously, you had expressed interes

[gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project

Hello, This email is to follow up on your communication with the Free Software Foundation. Previously, you had expressed interest in contributing to the GNU Project. If this is still the case please respond so that we can move the process along. If you did not receive the assignment please let us

[gnu.org #252800]

I'm sorry, but as this is only a general contact address, I cannot properly answer technical questions such as yours. The best I can do is refer you to the GCC Manual (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/) and Frequently Asked Questions (http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html). If neither of those provide an answ

[gnu.org #247501] Assignment form

Hello, Please complete the attached questionnaire according to the included instructions. All the best, Ted Teah Please email the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and we will send you the assignment form for your past and future changes. Please use your full name as the subject line

Re: [gnu.org #232556] GNU Mirror: SWITCHmirror replaces Swiss SunSITE

On Thu, 5 May 2005, John Sullivan wrote: > I've updated the mirror list on gnu.org. I'm passing this on to you so > you can consider it for the GCC mirrors list as per his request. Thanks. Please note that for http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html we only add mirrors which specificall

[gnu.org #232556] GNU Mirror: SWITCHmirror replaces Swiss SunSITE

Hello, I've updated the mirror list on gnu.org. I'm passing this on to you so you can consider it for the GCC mirrors list as per his request. Start of forwarded message Subject: [gnu.org #232556] GNU Mirror: SWITCHmirror replaces Swiss Sun

Re: [gnu.org #232057] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2

> Hi. Here's the second e-mail my previous message referred to. As > that e-mail explained, I'd sent my questions originally to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], thinking that that person would be the best one to > answer questions about GNU mailing lists, but James Blair responded by > recommending that I lo

Re: [gnu.org #232052] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1

> Hi. I'm hoping you can help me with the questions in this e-mail and > the one that follows. I'd sent each originally to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > thinking that that person would be the best one to answer questions > about GNU mailing lists, but James Blair responded by recommending > that I look at

FW: [gnu.org #232014] GNU Mailing Lists Question #1

riginal Message- From: www-data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Blair via RT Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gnu.org #232014] GNU Mailing Lists Question #1 Most gcc information can be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/>. You m

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

David Edelsohn wrote: Toon Moene writes: Toon> We (the GNU Fortran folk) are in trouble too: We're awaiting Toon> affirmation of the receipt of Thomas Koenig's papers (sent from Germany Toon> on the 19th of March). He has quite a few patches to gfortran in the Toon> queue and GCC 4.0 (the fir

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

> Toon Moene writes: Toon> We (the GNU Fortran folk) are in trouble too: We're awaiting Toon> affirmation of the receipt of Thomas Koenig's papers (sent from Germany Toon> on the 19th of March). He has quite a few patches to gfortran in the Toon> queue and GCC 4.0 (the first GCC release t

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Peter Brown via RT wrote: > Dear Swami, > > Sorry for our delay in responding to your request. FSF's Assignment > Administrator is currently unavailable, and we expect there to be a > delay in processing your request for at least another week. > > Please bear with us whilst we arrange for additi

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Peter Brown via RT wrote: > Dear Swami, > > Sorry for our delay in responding to your request. FSF's Assignment > Administrator is currently unavailable, and we expect there to be a > delay in processing your request for at least another week. > > Please bear with us whilst we arrange for additi

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Peter Brown via RT wrote: Dear Swami, Sorry for our delay in responding to your request. FSF's Assignment Administrator is currently unavailable, and we expect there to be a delay in processing your request for at least another week. Please bear with us whilst we arrange for additional help. We (th

[gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

ance. > > Thanks, > Swami > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:11:38 +0530 (IST) > From: M Ranga Swami Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ted Teah via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude L

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF (fwd)

Hello, Please send your response for the below (forwarded) message. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Swami -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:11:38 +0530 (IST) From: M Ranga Swami Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ted Teah via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, Please find the name of the organization, the name and title of the person who will sign on the contract: Name of the Organization: Sankhya Technologies Private Limited Name : A.R.S.Kumar Title : Asst.Manager - Legal Compliances Mailing Address: Sankhya Technologies

[gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, Please provide me with the name of the corporation, the name and title of the person who is to sign the contract and the mailing address. I will then draft and mail the assignment to you. All the best, Ted Teah > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 16 04:38:04 2005]: > > > Hi, > > We would l

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hi, We would like use corporate assignment. Could you please send us the requited templates for this?. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Swami On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote: > Hello, > > I assume you want to use individual assignments, is that correct? > I have attached the emplo

[gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, I assume you want to use individual assignments, is that correct? I have attached the employer disclaimer. In addition, I have attached a questionnaire. This questionnaire includes instructions for its completion. Upon receipt of the questionnaire, the FSF will review the answers, and if

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, Thanks for the response. Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the assignment should be performed. Thanks, Swami On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote: > Hello Swami, > > > You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who >

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, Thanks for the response. Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the assignment should be performed. Thanks, Swami On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote: > Hello Swami, > > > You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who >

Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello, Thanks for the response. Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the assignment should be performed. Thanks, Swami On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote: > Hello Swami, > > > You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who >

[gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Hello Swami, You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who worked on the code with a disclaimer from the company, or you could use a corporate assignment which would cover all the employees at the firm. All the best, Ted TEah Assignment Administrator