Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 09/23/2010 08:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Diego Novillo writes:
>>
>>> I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and
>>> then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> Basile, I'm sorry you have to struggle
On 09/24/2010 11:29 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
I don't understand what concrete steps are you suggesting. As
explained above, I am using M-x indent-region but it does indent
gengtype code because gengtype is mis-indented from the beginning.
Maybe my patches will never go into trunk because
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 08:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >Diego Novillo writes:
> >
> >>I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and
> >>then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch.
> >
> >Yes.
I d
On 09/23/2010 08:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Diego Novillo writes:
I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and
then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch.
Yes.
Basile, I'm sorry you have to struggle with some poor existing
indentation in gengty
Diego Novillo writes:
> I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and
> then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch.
Yes.
Basile, I'm sorry you have to struggle with some poor existing
indentation in gengtype.c, but the GNU style indentation is not all t
I'd suggest sending one initial patch fixing indentation issues and
then sending your functional changes on top of the first patch.
Diego.
Hello All,
References
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01739.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01740.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01742.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01743.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/
