Various errors encountered while compiling gcj.

While attempting to compile gcc with gcj re-added, the compilation fails on a varying number of errors. I have solved most of the errors, but these are the remaining ones I am stuck on. The code I am building from is available here: https://github.com/Zopolis4/gcj/tree/gcjmainbuild . My apologies

4.9.4 release latest tag does not build - ICE in gcj

-dssi --with-java-home=/usr/local/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-java-maintainer-mode --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --disable-libjava-multilib --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local --with-mpc=/usr/local --with-tune=native --with-arch

Re: Install gcj with gcc5 on ubunto

Hello, I have an ubuntu. I installed gcc 5 to be able to install gcj (because gcj is no longer distributed with the new version of gcc).when I run apt-cache search gcj I get this : gcj-5-jdk - GCJ and Classpath development tools for Java(TM) I tried then to install it by running apt-get

Install gcj with gcc5 on ubunto

Hello,Can you give me installation. Instructions  To install gcj after installing gcc5 or gcc6. Apt-get install gcj did not work  Thank you very much Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android

Re: GCJ wiki page

On 7 August 2017 at 02:29, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > The GCJ wiki page https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCJ appears to be very > obsolete. According to this page, GCJ is part of GCC, but AFAIK, > GCJ has been removed from GCC. Thanks, I've updated the page.

GCJ wiki page

Hi, The GCJ wiki page https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCJ appears to be very obsolete. According to this page, GCJ is part of GCC, but AFAIK, GCJ has been removed from GCC. Regards, -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.v

Re: Remove broken GCC 7.1 GCJ manual links

Hi Krisztian, On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Paczári Krisztián wrote: > GCJ has been removed from GCC 7.1, so these broken links should also be > removed from the documentation page (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/) > and probably from the scripts generating them: "GCC 7.1 GCJ Manual (als

Remove broken GCC 7.1 GCJ manual links

Hi, GCJ has been removed from GCC 7.1, so these broken links should also be removed from the documentation page (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/) and probably from the scripts generating them: "GCC 7.1 GCJ Manual (also in PDF or PostScript or an HTML tarball)" Thanks, Krisztian Paczari

Re: Argument Against Removal of GCJ

On 22 February 2017 at 05:52, R0b0t1 wrote: > Many of the users of GCJ and GNU Classpath do not know they are users > and, even if they do know, are not aware that it is being considered > for removal from the GCC nor aware of this mailing list. It's not being considered for r

Re: Argument Against Removal of GCJ

On 22/02/17 05:52, R0b0t1 wrote: > I have found GCJ to be one of the best methods for bootstrapping > OpenJDK. No other method of adding support for new architectures that > does not involve working closely with OpenJDK upstream is known to me. That doesn't matter any more becau

Argument Against Removal of GCJ

I have found GCJ to be one of the best methods for bootstrapping OpenJDK. No other method of adding support for new architectures that does not involve working closely with OpenJDK upstream is known to me. It is, of course, possible to add any architecture without the use of GCJ, but if one wishes

Re: About GCJ compiler

for Java Programming > Language on mobile phones". On this project, I am planning to use GCJ > to cross-compile Java for ARM. I am planning to add some extra > ISAs(Instruction Set Architecture). But, if I add an extra ISAs, as you > know, I have to generate binary codes corresponding to

About GCJ compiler

lanning to use GCJ to cross-compile Java for ARM. I am planning to add some extra ISAs(Instruction Set Architecture). But, if I add an extra ISAs, as you know, I have to generate binary codes corresponding to my new architecture. My question is if I can modify GCJ for my purpose. Is it possible to

Re: RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report

On 08/07/11 18:31, Jie Liu wrote: > This is the second report after “GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status > Report”[1]. During this time, I am > --- Focusing on running the testsuite and fix encountered problem > --- Submitting patches to related community > > In details, I have got th

RTEMS Port of GCJ Progress Report

Hi, This is the second report after “GCJ Porting for RTEMS Status Report”[1]. During this time, I am --- Focusing on running the testsuite and fix encountered problem --- Submitting patches to related community In details, I have got the testsuite result for boehm-gc, libffi and libjava, which

Re: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?

Is the Classpath library that gcj uses something that could be updated to have everything Netbeans needs? Netbeans has grown on me in functionality. It's just that it uses like 2 gigs of memory and is often very slow when many files are open. I imagine if there ever were a case for gcj's

Re: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?

On 17/05/11 19:16, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote: > Hi, > Has anyone compiled netbeans with gcj? > If so, can you please post your method? I don't think so. I'm sure gcj could compile Netbeans, but I am not at all sure that the Classpath library that gcj uses has everyt

Re: Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?

Sean Robert McGuffee writes: > Has anyone compiled netbeans with gcj? > If so, can you please post your method? The mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org is for discussions related to the development of gcc itself. Questions like this should go on the mailing list gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. Or, i

Compiling Netbeans with GCJ?

Hi, Has anyone compiled netbeans with gcj? If so, can you please post your method? Thanks, Sean

Re: gcj fails to compile java

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:21:45PM +0100, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 25 September 2010 14:20, Jack Howarth wrote: > >  I've filed PR45773 concerning the new regression in gcj where java classes > > can > > no longer be compiled with ecj.jar. Since r163770 (with

Re: gcj fails to compile java

On 25 September 2010 14:20, Jack Howarth wrote: >  I've filed PR45773 concerning the new regression in gcj where java classes > can > no longer be compiled with ecj.jar. Since r163770 (with r163814 backported to > fix > the libjava build), any attempt to compile a java

gcj fails to compile java

I've filed PR45773 concerning the new regression in gcj where java classes can no longer be compiled with ecj.jar. Since r163770 (with r163814 backported to fix the libjava build), any attempt to compile a java source file with gcj produces the error... gcj --main=testme -O testme

Is gcj dead?

Last news in http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ are dated March 2007. Also I submitted few PRs a month ago and there is no response at all. Yuri

Re: gcj build issues.

ives. Edward> I'll submit bugs for these, but really - where is there a Edward> tinderbox-like compile farm which shows both status of automated Edward> builds on different OSes, and dependencies to make these automated Edward> builds successful? I would think this would sav

Re: gcj build issues.

b/libgcj.so.10) >> ld.so.1: ecj1: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such >> file or directory >> gcj: Internal error: Killed (program ecj1) >> Please submit a full bug report. >> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instr

Re: gcj build issues.

al: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such > file or directory > gcj: Internal error: Killed (program ecj1) > Please submit a full bug report. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > > I can get through 1 and 2, but 3 has me stumped. W

gcj build issues.

All, I'm just curious - what version of gcc has the latest stable gcj? I've been trying to build gcc-4.4.0 on solaris and have been running into multiple issues: 1. gperf (version 3.0.4) generates incorrect code killing the build: ../.././gcc/cp/cfns.gperf:84: error: &

Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Andrew Haley wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:05:03AM CET: >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:20:35AM CET: I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix ; Warnings handled by ecj. -;

Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches

* Andrew Haley wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:05:03AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:20:35AM CET: > >> I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix > >> > >> ; Warnings handled by ecj. > >> -; FIXME: document them > >>

Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Ping! > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:20:35AM CET: >> I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix >> >> --- a/gcc/java/lang.opt >> +++ b/gcc/java/lang.opt >> @@ -209,212 +209,213 @@ Java >> >> ; >> ; Warnings handled by ec

Re: gcj -v --help: ecj switches

Ping! * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:20:35AM CET: > I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix > > --- a/gcc/java/lang.opt > +++ b/gcc/java/lang.opt > @@ -209,212 +209,213 @@ Java > > ; > ; Warnings handled by ecj. > -; FIXME: document them > ; >

gcj -v --help: ecj switches

Hello, I have a patch (accompanying those other ones on gcc-paches) to fix --- a/gcc/java/lang.opt +++ b/gcc/java/lang.opt @@ -209,212 +209,213 @@ Java ; ; Warnings handled by ecj. -; FIXME: document them ; but I did start off with the help texts from

RE: gcj/sparc64?

This seems t have worked, applied against 4.3.1, based on what I saw was the MinGW fix. $ diff -u /src/gcc.orig/config/mh-cygwin /src/gcc/config/mh-cygwin --- /src/gcc.orig/config/mh-cygwin 2002-12-16 18:58:05.0 -0800 +++ /src/gcc/config/mh-cygwin 2008-08-10 06:09:39.71875 -070

Re: Java Development with GCJ

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Daniel B. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello -- > > I am acting for a friend with a java application who needs to run it on a > microcontroller. Though aware of GC, I only recently learned of GCJ. > > Accordingly, I am looking for d

Java Development with GCJ

Hello -- I am acting for a friend with a java application who needs to run it on a microcontroller. Though aware of GC, I only recently learned of GCJ. Accordingly, I am looking for developer resources using GCJ for microcontrollers. Anyone, manufacturer, developer, or hobbyist who has

Re: gcj/sparc64?

Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess configure -only-pic might be nice. It's spelled --with-pic. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276

RE: gcj/sparc64?

> From: brian@ >> > This stack exhaustion is PR36218 which was supposedly fixed on > mainline. Two problems: the fix needs to be extended to Cygwin as well > as MinGW, and you're not building mainline. > >> I wish Windows code was PIC > > zero to do with the topic of this thread. I agree it's a t

Re: gcj/sparc64?

Jay wrote: > /src/gcc/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/swing/text/html/parser/HTML_401F.java:0: > in > ternal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. This stack exhaustion is PR36218 which was supposedly

RE: gcj/sparc64?

onally I think compiling non-PIC is a waste. Compile everything twice? Yuck. I wish Windows code was PIC, then wouldn't worry about base addresses and the cost of relocs.. (even if AMD64 is mostly PIC, the data still isn't, e.g. vtables). - Jay > Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:09:36 +0100

gcj

Hello. I read this page : http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ and see no news until about one year. The most links (status, done) have the same old update. Gcj project do it abandon or stop ? Or just stop web maintain ? I'm interest by advance of integration of java 1.5 into gcj. When a new release 

Re: gcj/sparc64?

ay> Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > > [...] > Jay> /.libs/HTML_401F.o > Jay> gcj: Internal error: Segmentation Fault (program jc1) > Jay> Please submit a full bug report. > > Knowing this particular file, maybe gcj just ran out of memory. > Anywa

RE: gcj/sparc64?

Sorry Tom, I find opening bugs often tedious..sign up an account, fill in a bunch of fields.. I'll try to get more details "later" (if it repros consistently, callstack in a debugger) - Jay > To: Jayk > CC: gcc > Subject: Re: gcj/sparc64? > From: Tom > D

Re: gcj/sparc64?

>>>>> "Jay" == Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jay> This is an incomplete bug report. Jay> unified gcc 4.3.1/binutils 2.18/gmp/mpfr tree: Jay> -bash-3.00$ gcc -v Jay> Using built-in specs. Jay> Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 [...] Ja

gcj/sparc64?

sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 -disable-multilib -disable-bootstrap \ -disable-nls sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 CFLAGS=-m64 MAKEINFO=echo && make \ MAKEINFO=echo CFLAGS=-m64 libtool: compile: /home/jay/obj/gcc.1/gcc/gcj -B/home/jay/obj/gcc.1/sparc64-sun -solaris2.10/libjava/

Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in

Steve Perkins wrote: >> You couldn't do that. However, libgcj carries with it an exception that >> allows you to link non-GPL code. Look at the license for more details. > >Can you perhaps elaborate? No offense, but I think the original > message makes clear that "looking at the licenses for

Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in

> You couldn't do that. However, libgcj carries with it an exception that > allows you to link non-GPL code. Look at the license for more details. Can you perhaps elaborate? No offense, but I think the original message makes clear that "looking at the licenses for more details" was the firs

Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in

Steve Perkins wrote: >I have a question about using GCC/GCJ to compile a Java application > which uses the SWT framework for its GUI, and whether this locks you in > or out of any licensing options. I apologize in advance if this > question is somewhat off-topic... I searched &qu

Re: GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in

Steve Perkins wrote: I have a question about using GCC/GCJ to compile a Java application which uses the SWT framework for its GUI, and whether this locks you in or out of any licensing options. I apologize in advance if this question is somewhat off-topic... I searched "gnu.org&q

GCC/GCJ, SWT, and license lock-in

I have a question about using GCC/GCJ to compile a Java application which uses the SWT framework for its GUI, and whether this locks you in or out of any licensing options. I apologize in advance if this question is somewhat off-topic... I searched "gnu.org" for a mailing list sp

Re: gcj broken on darwin

Jack Howarth wrote: > Matthias, >My mistake. I see the same issue with gcc-4.2.2 on darwin > which is indeed resolved with --main=testme. I am puzzled why > this isn't automatically handled (as it seems to be with > javac)? It's isn't automatically handled, you have to provide it at runtime:

Re: gcj broken on darwin

nefit, you also get the ability to shoot yourself in the foot. This is of course documented in: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcj/Linking.html David Daney

Re: gcj broken on darwin

ew Haley schrieb: > > Jack Howarth wrote: > >>It appears that gcj in gcc 4.3.0 is broken on Darwin. If > >> one builds gcc 4.3.0 executing... > >> > >> contrib/download_ecj > >> > >> before running configure, the build succeeds in c

Re: gcj broken on darwin

Andrew Haley schrieb: > Jack Howarth wrote: >>It appears that gcj in gcc 4.3.0 is broken on Darwin. If >> one builds gcc 4.3.0 executing... >> >> contrib/download_ecj >> >> before running configure, the build succeeds in creating an >> ecj1 bu

Re: gcj broken on darwin

Jack Howarth wrote: >It appears that gcj in gcc 4.3.0 is broken on Darwin. If > one builds gcc 4.3.0 executing... > > contrib/download_ecj > > before running configure, the build succeeds in creating an > ecj1 but when gcj is used to compile an example like testme.java

gcj broken on darwin

It appears that gcj in gcc 4.3.0 is broken on Darwin. If one builds gcc 4.3.0 executing... contrib/download_ecj before running configure, the build succeeds in creating an ecj1 but when gcj is used to compile an example like testme.java... public class testme { public static void main

gcj-4.3.0-9

I noticed while building test gcc43 fink packaging that the gcj-4.3.0 subdirectory in the gcc installation directory has been suddenly changed to gcj-4.3.0-9. Is this intentional or a typo in one of the patches? Jack

Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.

On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:08 PM, J.C. Pizarro wrote: For performance and simplicity, i show this summary JC, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I don't think that this is the right forum for discussions about LLVM vs GCC. If you'd like to discuss LLVM, please take it to an LLVM-related mailin

When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.

For performance and simplicity, i show this summary 1. "The LLVM Compiler System" by Chris Lattner http://llvm.org/pubs/2007-03-12-BossaLLVMIntro.html http://llvm.org/pubs/2007-03-12-BossaLLVMIntro.pdf 2. "LLVM in OpenGL and for Dynamic Languages" by Chris Lattner http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/

Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.

"J.C. Pizarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. Stop developing new features to GCJ > and start to develop the more advanced IcedTea (a.k.a. OpenJDK). > > http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki//Main_Page > > > 2. Stop developing new features to GCC'

When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.

1. Stop developing new features to GCJ and start to develop the more advanced IcedTea (a.k.a. OpenJDK). http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki//Main_Page 2. Stop developing new features to GCC's backend and start to develop the more advanced LLVM-GCC. http://llvm.org/ (Low Level Virtual Ma

gcj java help

Hello all, How I can import security in gcj java as we used keytool in jdk. Plz give me appropriate guidence. -- Thanks and Regards Sharad Singh Sr. Project Associate EE, IIT Kanpur Mob:+91- 9450 328 117 Accessing Brihaspati: http://202.141.40.217:8080/brihaspati/servlet/brihaspati

Re: gcj install failed

case, gcc-4.1.2. 3.) For a number of reasons, it is not recommended to build GCC within the source directory. Instead, you should create an empty build directory, and then run gcc-4.1.2/configure from within that empty build directory, and then run "make" in the build directory.

gcj install failed

Hi, am trying to istall the GCJ 4.1.2 version on my SUNOs. steps i followed: 1. downloaded GCJ4.1.2 core and java tar from GNU site. and extracted it to GCC4.1 after extracting folder GCC-4.1.2 is created(automatically while extracting). the frontend part (java tar) was extraced to /gcc

Re: Merging the gcj-eclipse branch

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> We're planning to merge the 'gcj-eclipse' branch back to the Tom> trunk this week. We discovered a couple libjava test suite failures in the merged tree. I'm holding off commit

Re: Merging the gcj-eclipse branch

> > We're planning to merge the 'gcj-eclipse' branch back to the trunk > this week. This branch holds a major overhaul of gcj, and in > particular changes gcj to use the Eclipse java compiler as a kind of > preprocessor. This change was approved by the GCC Steeri

Merging the gcj-eclipse branch

We're planning to merge the 'gcj-eclipse' branch back to the trunk this week. This branch holds a major overhaul of gcj, and in particular changes gcj to use the Eclipse java compiler as a kind of preprocessor. This change was approved by the GCC Steering Committee. Most of the

gcj internals documentation

Hi, I'm having difficulty finding any documentation for the gcj internals, apart from the source, Chapter 12 of the gcj manual, a couple of Linux Journal articles, and some papers from 1997. Is there anything else that describes the workings of the gcj front-end and run-time libraries

Re: gcj install glitch

On Sep 17, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: I am seeing a problem with gcc trunk in the 'make install' when java support is built on Darwin PPC. The failure is... make[7]: *** No rule to make target `org/w3c/dom/html2/ HTMLCollection.java/org/w3c/dom/html2/HTMLCollection.class', need

gcj install glitch

c4-4.1.-20060916/darwin_objdir/powerpc-apple-darwin9/ppc64/libjava Adding generated files in builddir '..'. make -f ../../../../../../gcc-4.2-20060916/libjava/classpath/lib/Makefile.gcj \ GCJ='/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.-20060916/darwin_objdir/gcc/gcj -B/sw/src/fink.build/g

Re: GCJ on Darwin/i386 patches

It is probably too late to get this resolved before gcc trunk branches but we have an outstanding patch for building gcj on Darwin/386 awaiting on Sandro Tolaini's paperwork being processed. He told me that he scanned the form back to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but still hasn't heard bac

Re: GCJ on Darwin/i386 patches

Sandro Tolaini writes: > Finally, I managed to fix up libffi and run testing on libjava under > Darwin/i386. > > The failures are due to the missing signal unwinding code (something > that is out of my reach at the moment, so we must live with it at the > moment unless someone is willi

GCJ on Darwin/i386 patches

Finally, I managed to fix up libffi and run testing on libjava under Darwin/i386. Here is the libffi testsuite output: Test Run By sandro on Sun Mar 26 10:49:37 2006 Native configuration is i386-apple-darwin8.5.2 === libffi tests === Schedule of variations: unix Running

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Sandro Tolaini wrote: I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't understand some directives. My patch works on the

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

Sandro Tolaini writes: > > On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew. > > I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ > Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file > because App

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

On 11/mar/2006, at 02:09, Tom Tromey wrote: Yes, one of the test cases in the libjava test suite checks this. Offhand I forget which one... but if you do a 'make check' and send the list of FAILs we can help analyze them. (This would be better done on the gcj list, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

at the x86 darwin port, >> perhaps some gcc hacking is required. Sandro> How can I try this? Is there some test case I can use? Yes, one of the test cases in the libjava test suite checks this. Offhand I forget which one... but if you do a 'make check' and send the list of FA

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote: libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew. I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't u

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

>>>>> "Sandro" == Sandro Tolaini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sandro> Hi everyone, I would like to port gcj/libgcj to i386-darwin. Is there Sandro> someone already working on that? Not that I know of. Sandro> target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-d

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-darwin to the supported > > platforms > > zlib is being skipped only because libjava is. > > > target-boehm-gc: a patch exists for porting to the new platform, so it > > should be a matter of applying it > > W

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-darwin to the supported platforms zlib is being skipped only because libjava is. target-boehm-gc: a patch exists for porting to the new platform, so it should be a matter of applying it Well, good. target-libffi, target-libmudflap, target-libj

Porting gcj to i386-darwin

Hi everyone, I would like to port gcj/libgcj to i386-darwin. Is there someone already working on that? Considering that powerpc-darwin is a supported platform, it should not prove to be too hard. However, I need some hints on how to proceed. At configure phase, GCC woes for: target

Re: [Bug target/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

Andrew Haley schrieb: > Rainer Emrich writes: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Andrew Haley schrieb: > > > Rainer Emrich writes: > > > > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv: > > > > LIBICONV > > > > which is > > > > > LIBICONV='/appl/sh

Re: SOLVED: Wrestling with exceptions on win32 gcj 4.1

mangled in some way. anyway, now i'm able to run basic swt application, and throw and catch exceptions. i'm happy and hope this could help somebody else to use gcj 4.1 on windows. it would be unfortunate if gcj could not be used for most popular os ;) so, the first patch makes uw_frame_st

Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST)

On 8/25/05, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > In the last 24 hours, something has gone in which makes > > > the GCJ interpreter "gij" abort on even simple "Hello World" > > > classes. For example, the "RuntimeChec

Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST)

> > > In the last 24 hours, something has gone in which makes > > the GCJ interpreter "gij" abort on even simple "Hello World" > > classes. For example, the "RuntimeCheck" program in > > the Jacks testsuite: > > I had (probably) t

Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST)

> In the last 24 hours, something has gone in which makes > the GCJ interpreter "gij" abort on even simple "Hello World" > classes. For example, the "RuntimeCheck" program in > the Jacks testsuite: I had (probably) the same thing yesterday. Here'

GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST)

Hi, In the last 24 hours, something has gone in which makes the GCJ interpreter "gij" abort on even simple "Hello World" classes. For example, the "RuntimeCheck" program in the Jacks testsuite: 8< publ

Re: please update the gcj main page

--- Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Gerald Pfeifer: > > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > >> For code. > >> I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much > >> easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. > > > > I have seen such stat

Re: please update the gcj main page

* Gerald Pfeifer: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> For code. >> I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much >> easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. > > I have seen such statements, by RMS himself. The official position might have change

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 23:20 -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > You don't really need copyright assignment (IE you can go along with > just licenses) unless you plan on suing people over your documentation, > which seems even less likely than suing someone over your code. > > I don't follow

Re: please update the gcj main page

You don't really need copyright assignment (IE you can go along with just licenses) unless you plan on suing people over your documentation, which seems even less likely than suing someone over your code. I don't follow. The issue is that somebody claims that the FSF documentation inf

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 22:50 -0400, Robert Dewar wrote: > Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > >>For code. > >>I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much > >>easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. > > > > > > I hav

Re: please update the gcj main page

Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: For code. I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. I have seen such statements, by RMS himself. removing stuff is a remedy for copyright vi

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > For code. > I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much > easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code. I have seen such statements, by RMS himself. Gerald

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 23:12 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > We may to want to wait until we hear about the outcome of discussion > > on the copyright (assignment) aspects of the Wiki vs wwwdocs and gcc/doc, > > or we may be in troubles at some point

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 01:02 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > >> We may to want to wait until we hear about the outcome of discussion > >> on the copyright (assignment) aspects of the Wiki vs wwwdocs and gcc/doc, > > We are not the first nor the last project

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > We may to want to wait until we hear about the outcome of discussion > on the copyright (assignment) aspects of the Wiki vs wwwdocs and gcc/doc, > or we may be in troubles at some point in the future when we try to move > documentation around. The same

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> We may to want to wait until we hear about the outcome of discussion >> on the copyright (assignment) aspects of the Wiki vs wwwdocs and gcc/doc, > We are not the first nor the last project to have a wiki that needs to > move documentation from the wiki

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 00:30 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Tom Tromey wrote: > >> The FAQ is badly in need of an update - in fact, it should be moved > >> over to the Wiki (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCJ) in order to be easier > >> to update and mai

Re: please update the gcj main page

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Tom Tromey wrote: >> The FAQ is badly in need of an update - in fact, it should be moved >> over to the Wiki (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCJ) in order to be easier >> to update and maintain. > Great idea, I agree. > We've had a lot of trouble with b

  1   2   >