Re: gcc.target/powerpc vs -m64

2006-09-01 Thread Segher Boessenkool
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-and-1.c scan-assembler rlwinm [0-9]+, [0-9]+,0,0,30 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-and-1.c scan-assembler rlwinm [0-9]+, [0-9]+,0,29,30 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-negeq0-1.c scan-assembler-not cntlzw are a tad confusing because if I do... gcc-4 -O2 -m64 -S -c ppc-a

gcc.target/powerpc vs -m64

2006-08-30 Thread Jack Howarth
Geoff, I am assuming that quite a few of the remaining regressions at -m64 on Darwin PPC with your TImode patch applied will be resolved when Eric posts his x86_64 patches. However there are a few in gcc.target/powerpc which likely won't be addressed by those patches. I am seeing the following t