[wwwdocs] make release download more prominent (was: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html)

On Sun, 22 May 2005, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Maybe you may want to have a look to web/21679 too, anyway, I think Dave > Abrahams has a point. I installed the patch below. If this is not sufficient, we could consider creating a download page of its own, though this would add yet another level of in

Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html

On Sun, 22 May 2005, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> I'll see what I can do about the formatting, > Thanks! I installed the following patch. Gerald Streamline the reference to our binaries page. Remove references to egcs internal version numbers. Index: releases.html ==

Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html

Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >I'll see what I can do about the formatting, > Thanks! > but the missing release >is a feature (so that our release managers do not have to perform that >many manual steps during the process). > >That's why the page states: > > Please refer to our development plan for rele

Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html

On Sun, 22 May 2005, Paolo Carlini wrote: > the GCC Timeline doesn't seem ok: a wide 'internal version' field and > 4.0.0 completely missing. Is this a known issue? I'll see what I can do about the formatting, but the missing release is a feature (so that our release managers do not have to perfor

gcc.gnu.org/releases.html

Hi, the GCC Timeline doesn't seem ok: a wide 'internal version' field and 4.0.0 completely missing. Is this a known issue? Thanks, Paolo.