On 11/22/2011 12:11 PM, Bodart, Mitch L wrote:
> Unfortunately the source change suggestion didn't work, but that's OK because
> I can make the asm work by eliminating some register pressure.
Hmm. Well, if you keep that "memory" clobber there, you don't actually
need to represent the RW memory a
the answer is no, or atleast, nothing that's going to be fixed
anytime soon.
thanks again!
Mitch
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 11:35 AM
> To: Bodart, Mitch L
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject:
On 11/22/2011 10:55 AM, Bodart, Mitch L wrote:
> What aspect of inline asm processing is preventing gcc from allocating
> register eax to both %0 and %1's address in the following test case?
>
> gcc -m32 -S foo.c
> foo.c: In function 'foo':
> foo.c:20: error: can't find a register in c
Hello colleagues,
I've come across a suspicious error with inline asm and register allocation,
and am looking for a clarification of the rules.
What aspect of inline asm processing is preventing gcc from allocating
register eax to both %0 and %1's address in the following test case?
gcc -m32
