Le 05. 10. 10 06:53, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> It seems that the new Bugzilla does not set a Message-ID header when
> sending mail.
You come a bit late in the game, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45818 ;)
Frédéric
* Frédéric Buclin:
> If nothing severe is found in the coming days, we will probably upgrade
> the production installation later this week. I think Ian will keep you
> informed about this.
It seems that the new Bugzilla does not set a Message-ID header when
sending mail. While this is not a viol
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Frédéric Buclin wrote:
> Le 21. 09. 10 01:18, Jonathan Wakely a écrit :
> > Oops, I didn't realise that changes to the test installation get
> > emailed to gcc-bugs and to the users who reported the bug or are CC'd
> > on it
>
> Yeah, it's a production-ready installation, wit
2010/9/21 Frédéric Buclin :
> Le 21. 09. 10 01:18, Jonathan Wakely a écrit :
>> Oops, I didn't realise that changes to the test installation get
>> emailed to gcc-bugs and to the users who reported the bug or are CC'd
>> on it
>
> Yeah, it's a production-ready installation, with all features enable
Le 21. 09. 10 01:18, Jonathan Wakely a écrit :
> Oops, I didn't realise that changes to the test installation get
> emailed to gcc-bugs and to the users who reported the bug or are CC'd
> on it
Yeah, it's a production-ready installation, with all features enabled.
:) Only bugs filed in the Bugzill
2010/9/20 Frédéric Buclin:
>
> Have fun testing the new Bugzilla,
Oops, I didn't realise that changes to the test installation get
emailed to gcc-bugs and to the users who reported the bug or are CC'd
on it, but that raised a couple of possible bugs.
I've filed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/sh
Hi all,
I'm done with the implementation of customizations for the 3.6.2
Bugzilla installation. The test installation, which is based on a copy
of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot taken on September 9), is live at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
Please test it, and file bugs related to miss
Le 10. 09. 10 12:22, Richard Guenther a écrit :
> So - can you enumerate the customizations you didn't bring over?
I have no official list of customizations to port to the newer Bugzilla.
All I have in hands are the two patches attached to bug 43011, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
e more
> easily maintainable and portable to future releases of Bugzilla.
>
> For a list of new features available in Bugzilla 3.6.2, see the release
> notes at http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.2/release-notes.html.
>
> To track progress on the GCC Bugzilla upgrade, our meta b
see the release
notes at http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.6.2/release-notes.html.
To track progress on the GCC Bugzilla upgrade, our meta bug is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
Have fun testing the new Bugzilla,
LpSolit
PS: Those of you who cannot log into http://gcc.gnu.or
2010/9/7 Frédéric Buclin :
> Le 07. 09. 10 19:14, NightStrike a écrit :
>> So for instance, instead of 2.20+ > 3.6.1, I was doing 2.20 > 2.21, etc.
>
> Wow, iterating this way is too long (and 2.21 is a development snapshot,
> not a stable release). We must jump directly from 2.20 to 3.6.2, else we
Le 07. 09. 10 19:14, NightStrike a écrit :
> So for instance, instead of 2.20+ > 3.6.1, I was doing 2.20 > 2.21, etc.
Wow, iterating this way is too long (and 2.21 is a development snapshot,
not a stable release). We must jump directly from 2.20 to 3.6.2, else we
will go nowhere. The code is defin
2010/9/7 Frédéric Buclin :
> Le 07. 09. 10 18:51, NightStrike a écrit :
>> Well, I've been working on it since I got the approval. I just
>> haven't posted patches yet. Should I stop?
>
> If your patches are based on Bugzilla 3.6.x, no way! :)
>
> Could you please attach them to bug 43011?
>
>
>
Le 07. 09. 10 18:51, NightStrike a écrit :
> Well, I've been working on it since I got the approval. I just
> haven't posted patches yet. Should I stop?
If your patches are based on Bugzilla 3.6.x, no way! :)
Could you please attach them to bug 43011?
Frédéric
2010/9/7 Frédéric Buclin :
> Le 07. 09. 10 18:41, NightStrike a écrit :
I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who I
Le 07. 09. 10 18:41, NightStrike a écrit :
>>> I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
>>> guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
>>>
>>> Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who I
>>> can work with?
>>
>> I though
2010/9/7 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tom Browder wrote:
>> I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
>> guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
>>
>> Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who I
>> can work w
2010/9/7 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tom Browder wrote:
>> I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
>> guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
...
> I thought Frédéric Buclin (copied) is now working
> on this? Perhaps the two of you
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tom Browder wrote:
> I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
> guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
>
> Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who I
> can work with?
I thought Frédéric Buclin
I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who
I can work with?
Thanks.
Regards,
-Tom
Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Niceville, Florida
USA
20 matches
Mail list logo
