On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Pawel Sikora wrote:
> On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora :
>> >
>> > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
>> > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my co
On Monday 17 of January 2011 16:32:32 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> 2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora :
> >
> > will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
> > i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base
> > with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the
2011/1/17 Pawel Sikora :
>
> will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
> i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x features in my code base
> with 4.5 and would be nice to have 4.6 with the same c++0x subset working.
You can look at the priority field in bugzi
On Monday 17 of January 2011 11:49:04 Richard Guenther wrote:
> 2011/1/16 Mehmet Sinan Şahin :
> > Hi,
> >
> > When do you plan to release gcc 4.6?
>
> When it's ready.
will 4.6 c++0x regression (experimental code) will be taken into account?
i'm assking because i'm currently use few c++0x featur
2011/1/16 Mehmet Sinan Şahin :
> Hi,
>
> When do you plan to release gcc 4.6?
When it's ready.
Richard.
Hi,
When do you plan to release gcc 4.6?
Thanks
--
Mehmet Sinan Şahin
