===
# of expected passes2370
# of unexpected failures18
# of unsupported tests 9
I'll submit the full report soon.
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Amitava Dutta
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> From: Eric Botcazou
> Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 on
Amitava Dutta writes:
> You mentioned that the "make -k # check" is broken on Solaris.
You mean -j, not -k. There is no problem with -k.
> I built the compiler using the -k option, is that a concern?
> or is it just the "check" target is broken?
> IOW, should I build the compiler without the "
:
From: Eric Botcazou
Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 on Solaris 10 Sparc, some tests failed.
To: ad_...@yahoo.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Kaveh R. GHAZI"
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 1:37 AM
> Ran the "make -k check" without the -j option,
> after creating a symlink to /usr/loc
> Ran the "make -k check" without the -j option,
> after creating a symlink to /usr/local/bin/stty
> (noticed many errors about that)
>
> Is this as good a build as I can expect?
Probably, although the number of libgomp failures is high. You might want to
try with the GNU assembler instead of th
Ran the "make -k check" without the -j option,
after creating a symlink to /usr/local/bin/stty
(noticed many errors about that)
Is this as good a build as I can expect?
Here are the results
(output from config.guess and "gcc -v" are below) :
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected pa
