Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-04-04 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> Maybe we can remove DATESTAMP and updating it now that >>> gcc_update understands to extract the SVN revision number? >> Anyway, removing DATESTAMP would change the issue to new snapshots with no >> changes rather than with just DATESTAMP changes. > My regress

Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-05 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Joseph S. Myers >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: >> > >> >> Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I >> >> think it

Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > - Show quoted text - > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Joseph S. Myers >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: >> > >> >> Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is up

Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Joseph S. Myers > wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > >> Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I > >> think it is a waste > >> of resources. > > It is. > > > When 4.4 has br

Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I >> think it is a waste >> of resources. It is. > When 4.4 has branched I plan to close 4.2 branch. Maybe we can remove DATESTAMP an

Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-04 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I > think it is a waste > of resources. When 4.4 has branched I plan to close 4.2 branch. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-04 Thread H.J. Lu
Do we really need a new snapshot when only DATESTAMP is updated? I think it is a waste of resources. H.J. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:42 PM Subject: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Snapshot gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available

2009-03-04 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20090304/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches