The problem is that with new costs and new code for inlining functions called
once
we end up inlining empty virutal function to itself hoping to kill it.
I am testing the following that makes us to give up in such a werid case.
Thanks!
Paolo.
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paolo Carlini
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > whoever a few days ago or so broke this test, can please either fix the
> > > testcase, the compiler or just xfail for now the testcase itself, to avoid
> > > everybody the waste of time?
> > >
> > > If you want m
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paolo Carlini
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > whoever a few days ago or so broke this test, can please either fix the
> > testcase, the compiler or just xfail for now the testcase itself, to avoid
> > everybody the waste of time?
> >
> > If you want me to do go ahead w
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> whoever a few days ago or so broke this test, can please either fix the
> testcase, the compiler or just xfail for now the testcase itself, to avoid
> everybody the waste of time?
>
> If you want me to do go ahead with option 3 above,
Hi,
whoever a few days ago or so broke this test, can please either fix the
testcase, the compiler or just xfail for now the testcase itself, to
avoid everybody the waste of time?
If you want me to do go ahead with option 3 above, just let me know!
Thanks!
Paolo.
