Re: g++ segfault when using C++0x feature‏

2010-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 7 September 2010 22:50, James Dennett wrote: > I suspect we don't want to put a lot of effort into fixing C++0x > experimental support in GCC 4.4.x. In general that's correct, but in this case it's already fixed on the 4.4 branch, 4.4.4 doesn't crash. Nate, It's always worth trying an up-to-da

Re: g++ segfault when using C++0x feature‏

2010-09-07 Thread James Dennett
2010/9/7 Nathan Ridge : > > Hello, > > The attached minimal code (test.cpp) causes g++ to > segfault. It uses the C++0x features variadic templates and initializer > lists. > > The command used to compile it is: > > g++ -std=c++0x test.cpp > > The output is: > > test.cpp: In function ‘void f(const

g++ segfault when using C++0x feature‏

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Ridge
Hello, The attached minimal code (test.cpp) causes g++ to segfault. It uses the C++0x features variadic templates and initializer lists. The command used to compile it is: g++ -std=c++0x test.cpp The output is: test.cpp: In function ‘void f(const Args& ...) [with Args = ]’: test.cpp:21:   i